-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #94557
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #94557
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature.
Most of these tests either ran perfectly once enabled or only needed a small amount of tweaking to get passing or used ignore-test when ignore-lldb would have been more appropriate. With this change we go from 64 ignored tests to 50.
Manually tested via ``` // spawn a new cgroup scope for the current user $ sudo systemd-run -p CPUQuota="300%" --uid=$(id -u) -tdS // quota.rs #![feature(available_parallelism)] fn main() { println!("{:?}", std::thread::available_parallelism()); // prints Ok(3) } ``` Caveats * cgroup v1 is ignored * funky mountpoints (containing spaces, newlines or control chars) for cgroupfs will not be handled correctly since that would require unescaping /proc/self/mountinfo The escaping behavior of procfs seems to be undocumented. systemd and docker default to `/sys/fs/cgroup` so it should be fine for most systems. * quota will be ignored when `sched_getaffinity` doesn't work * assumes procfs is mounted under `/proc` and cgroupfs mounted and readable somewhere in the directory tree
this avoids parsing mountinfo which can be huge on some systems and something might be emulating cgroup fs for sandboxing reasons which means it wouldn't show up as mountpoint additionally the new implementation operates on a single pathbuffer, reducing allocations
… are now taken into account
To avoid the strange style where comments force `else` onto its own line. The commit also removes several else-after-return constructs, which can be hard to read.
There are three `Option` fields in `MatcherPos` that are only used in tandem. This commit combines them, making the code slightly easier to read. (It also makes clear that the `sep` field arguably should have been `Option<Option<Token>>`!)
Because `inner_parse_loop` has only one way to not succeed, not three.
Signed-off-by: cuishuang <[email protected]>
Use cgroup quotas for calculating `available_parallelism` Automated tests for this are possible but would require a bunch of assumptions. It requires root + a recent kernel, systemd and maybe docker. And even then it would need a helper binary since the test has to run in a separate process. Limitations * only supports cgroup v2 and assumes it's mounted under `/sys/fs/cgroup` * procfs must be available * the quota gets mixed into `sched_getaffinity`, so if the latter doesn't work then quota information gets ignored too Manually tested via ``` // spawn a new cgroup scope for the current user $ sudo systemd-run -p CPUQuota="300%" --uid=$(id -u) -tdS // quota.rs #![feature(available_parallelism)] fn main() { println!("{:?}", std::thread::available_parallelism()); // prints Ok(3) } ``` strace: ``` sched_getaffinity(3041643, 32, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]) = 32 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/self/cgroup", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 statx(0, NULL, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, NULL) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address) statx(3, "", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0444, stx_size=0, ...}) = 0 lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0 read(3, "0::/system.slice/run-u31477.serv"..., 128) = 36 read(3, "", 92) = 0 close(3) = 0 statx(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/run-u31477.service/cgroup.controllers", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0444, stx_size=0, ...}) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/run-u31477.service/cpu.max", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 statx(3, "", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0644, stx_size=0, ...}) = 0 lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0 read(3, "300000 100000\n", 20) = 14 read(3, "", 6) = 0 close(3) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cpu.max", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 statx(3, "", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT|AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_BASIC_STATS|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0644, stx_size=0, ...}) = 0 lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0 read(3, "max 100000\n", 20) = 11 read(3, "", 9) = 0 close(3) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu.max", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) sched_getaffinity(0, 128, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]) = 40 ``` r? `@joshtriplett` cc `@yoshuawuyts` Tracking issue and previous discussion: rust-lang#74479
ARM: Only allow using d16-d31 with asm! when supported by the target Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature. r? `````@nagisa`````
…ests, r=Mark-Simulacrum Re-enable debuginfo tests that have been ignored Most of these tests either ran perfectly once enabled or only needed a small amount of tweaking to get passing or used ignore-test when ignore-lldb would have been more appropriate. With this change we go from 64 ignored tests to 50.
…lacrum Remove num_cpus dependency from bootstrap, build-manifest and rustc_s… …ession `std::threads::available_parallelism` was stabilized in rust 1.59. r? `````@Mark-Simulacrum`````
Pass LLVM string attributes as string slices
…trochenkov `parse_tt` cleanups I've been looking closely at this code, and saw some opportunities to improve its readability. r? `@petrochenkov`
Doc: Fix use of quote instead of backstick in Adapter::map. A little commit to fix documentation rendering and semantics in https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/struct.Map.html#notes-about-side-effects `"` where used around an expression instead \`. Screenshot on doc.rust-lang.org: ![2022-03-03 11-21-43_backstick](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2827553/156546536-569b7692-7ac4-4388-8e93-c1628ddc6a0f.png) Looking forward: Maybe reworking the doc to use assert_eq like the upper paragraph: ``` let v: Vec<i32> = vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().map(|x| x + 1).rev().collect(); assert_eq!(v, [4, 3, 2]); ```
Fix invalid lint_node_id being put on a removed stmt This pull-request remove a invalid `assign_id!` being put on an stmt node. The problem is that this node is being removed away by a cfg making it unreachable when triggering a buffered lint. The comment in the other match arm already tell to not assign a id because it could have a `#[cfg()]` so this is just respecting the comment. Fixes rust-lang#94523 r? `@petrochenkov`
all: fix some typos Signed-off-by: cuishuang <[email protected]>
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 3, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit 3b53713 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Mar 3, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 3b53713 with merge 377ca6e2090c8dc36ec362e9290d23a287b4f0f5... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 3, 2022
This was referenced Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
available_parallelism
#92697 (Use cgroup quotas for calculatingavailable_parallelism
)parse_tt
cleanups #94547 (parse_tt
cleanups)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup