-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 11 pull requests #80439
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 11 pull requests #80439
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Complement to rust-lang#78863
This includes bytecodealliance/wasmtime#2403 which enables hotswapping with SimpleJIT
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
This can happen in generic code
Directly use raw pointers in `AtomicPtr` store/load I was unable to find any reason for this limitation in the latest source of LLVM or in the documentation [here](http://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#libcalls-atomic). fixes rust-lang/miri#1574
LICM in Cranelift has been fixed recently
This commit makes minor changes to the cranelift backend so that it can build given changes in cg_ssa for Split DWARF. Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
…omatsakis Move binder for dyn to each list item This essentially changes `ty::Binder<&'tcx List<ExistentialTraitRef>>` to `&'tcx List<ty::Binder<ExistentialTraitRef>>`. This is a first step in moving the `dyn Trait` representation closer to Chalk, which we've talked about in `@rust-lang/wg-traits.` r? `@nikomatsakis`
Lazy compilation in jit mode
This should not matter right now, but if we ever parallelize rustbuild this will avoid tarball contents being merged together.
…n_backend, r=oli-obk Move some more code out of CodegenBackend::{codegen_crate,link} Kind of a follow up to rust-lang#77795
…Simulacrum Update RELEASES.md for 1.49.0 ### [Rendered](https://github.com/XAMPPRocky/rust/tree/relnotes-1.49.0/RELEASES.md) r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum`` cc ``@rust-lang/release``
…arkor Suggest fn ptr rather than fn item and suggest to use `Fn` trait bounds rather than the unique closure type in E0121 Previously, using `_` as a return type in a function that returned a function/closure would provide a diagnostic that would cause a papercut. For example: ```rust fn f() -> i32 { 0 } fn fn_ptr() -> _ { f } fn closure() -> _ { || 0 } ``` would result in this diagnostic: ```rust error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> <anon>:2:16 | 2 | fn fn_ptr() -> _ { f } | ^ | | | not allowed in type signatures | help: replace with the correct return type: `fn() -> i32 {f}` error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> <anon>:3:17 | 3 | fn closure() -> _ { || 0 } | ^ | | | not allowed in type signatures | help: replace with the correct return type: `[closure@<anon>:3:21: 3:25]` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0121`. ``` As can be seen, it was suggested to use the function definition return type `fn() -> i32 { f }` which is not valid syntax as a return type. Additionally, closures cause a papercut as unique closure types (notated in this case as `[closure@<anon>:3:21: 3:25]`) are not valid syntax either. Instead, this PR implements this version of the diagnostic (this example is for the same code featured above): ```rust error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> <anon>:2:16 | 2 | fn fn_ptr() -> _ { f } | ^ | | | not allowed in type signatures | help: replace with the correct return type: `fn() -> i32` error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures --> <anon>:3:17 | 3 | fn closure() -> _ { || 0 } | ^ not allowed in type signatures | = help: consider using an `Fn`, `FnMut`, or `FnOnce` trait bound = note: for more information on `Fn` traits and closure types, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch13-01-closures.html error: aborting due to 2 previous errors For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0121`. ``` As can be seen in this diagnostic, the papercut for returning a function item is fixed by suggesting the usage of a function pointer as the return type. As for closures, it's suggested to use an `Fn`, `FnMut`, or `FnOnce` trait bound (with further reading on closures and `Fn` traits in *The Book* for beginners). I did not implement a suggestion to use `impl Fn() -> i32` syntax as that was out-of-scope for my abilities at the moment, therefore someone in the future may want to implement that. Also, it's possible to use either `impl Trait` syntax, generics, or generics with a `where` clause, and some users may not want to use `impl Trait` syntax for their own reasons. This PR fixes rust-lang#80179.
Add more comments to trait queries This also adds back a comment that was mistakenly removed in ac9dfc3.
use matches!() macro in more places
…k-Simulacrum BTreeMap: test split_off (and append) more thoroughly Using DeterministicRng as a poor man's property based testing rig. r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Document rustc_macros on nightly-rustc Fixes rust-lang#80345. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23638587/103113442-b7ba2d00-4628-11eb-8a4d-c542f2d170e1.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23638587/103113448-bc7ee100-4628-11eb-8657-2d72e88de656.png) r? ``@ehuss``
Remove FIXME in rustc_privacy rust-lang#71104 has been fixed. r? ``@marmeladema`` if you have time, otherwise ``@petrochenkov``
…jorn3 Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift The highlight of this sync are two JIT mode improvements. The first is that it is now possible to use JIT mode when using `-Zcodegen-backend` instead of the custom driver using `-Cllvm-args=mode=jit`. The second one is a new JIT mode that lazily compiles functions when they are called the first time: https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift/pull/1120 In addition this includes a few small runtime performance improvements and various fixes for rustc changes that didn't cause compilation to fail. r? ``@ghost`` ``@rustbot`` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
…sper rustc_span: Remove `Symbol::with` A subset of rust-lang#79425 that is a pure refactoring.
…rk-Simulacrum bootstrap: put the component name in the tarball temp dir path This should not matter right now, but if we ever parallelize rustbuild this will avoid tarball contents being merged together. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit a4a59a0 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Dec 28, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Dec 28, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Fn
trait bounds rather than the unique closure type in E0121 #80284 (Suggest fn ptr rather than fn item and suggest to useFn
trait bounds rather than the unique closure type in E0121)Symbol::with
#80411 (rustc_span: RemoveSymbol::with
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup