chore(docs): fix typos & wording in docs

[0xn4de]

This PR fixes wording and some typos in various ADR documentation files.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected spelling and grammar in various architecture documents.
  • Clarified language and fixed typos in governance improvement proposals.
  • Updated descriptions to reflect new features in liquid staking and core module API.
  • Enhanced clarity in mempool specifications by fixing typographical errors.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes across various architectural decision records (ADRs) and specifications primarily involve grammatical corrections, clarifications, and minor semantic adjustments. These edits enhance the readability and accuracy of the documents, which detail aspects of liquid staking, core module APIs, ABCI enhancements, simulation improvements, and governance in the Cosmos SDK, as well as mempool specifications.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
docs/architecture/adr-061-liquid-staking.md	Corrected a spelling error and introduced the concept of "Superfluid and Interfluid staking". Removed a statement about unsuitability for the Cosmos SDK.
docs/architecture/adr-063-core-module-api.md	Fixed grammatical issues and clarified the implementation requirements for HasPreBlocker, HasBeginBlocker, and HasEndBlocker interfaces. Adjusted phrasing to reflect the addition of new features to the core module API.
docs/architecture/adr-064-abci-2.0.md	Corrected a grammatical error without changing the logic or control flow.
docs/architecture/adr-067-simulator-v2.md	Fixed typos in comments and clarified the deprecation of invariant usage in module production execution paths.
docs/architecture/adr-069-gov-improvements.md	Improved sentence structure and fixed several typographical errors. Clarified the limitations and definitions related to multiple choice and optimistic proposals.
types/mempool/priority_nonce_spec.md	Corrected a typographical error in the description of priority edges between senders in the mempool.

---

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

• If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
• To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
• Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fb6205 and 59b0c1b.

Files selected for processing (6)

• docs/architecture/adr-061-liquid-staking.md (1 hunks)
• docs/architecture/adr-063-core-module-api.md (3 hunks)
• docs/architecture/adr-064-abci-2.0.md (1 hunks)
• docs/architecture/adr-067-simulator-v2.md (2 hunks)
• docs/architecture/adr-069-gov-improvements.md (3 hunks)
• types/mempool/priority_nonce_spec.md (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)

• docs/architecture/adr-061-liquid-staking.md
• docs/architecture/adr-064-abci-2.0.md
• docs/architecture/adr-067-simulator-v2.md
• types/mempool/priority_nonce_spec.md

Additional comments: 6

docs/architecture/adr-063-core-module-api.md (3)

• 285-287: The change from "has HasPreBlocker interfaces" to "should implement the HasPreBlocker interfaces" clarifies the expectation for modules regarding the implementation of the interface, aligning with the PR's objective to improve documentation clarity.

• 297-299: Similarly, the change from "has HasBeginBlocker and/or HasEndBlocker interfaces" to "should implement the HasBeginBlocker and/or HasEndBlocker interfaces" enhances the clarity of the documentation regarding the implementation requirements for modules.

• 455-455: The correction from "When new features are adding to the core" to "When new features are added to the core" fixes a grammatical error and ensures the sentence is properly structured.

docs/architecture/adr-069-gov-improvements.md (3)

• 19-25: The changes made to the context section improve the readability and correct the preposition use, aligning with the PR's objective to enhance documentation clarity.

• 66-72: The corrections in the governance parameters section fix typographical errors and enhance the document's accuracy without altering the technical content.

• 77-83: The changes in the multiple choice proposal section correct grammatical errors and clarify the proposal's characteristics, which is in line with the PR's objective to improve documentation.

[julienrbrt]

Thank you!