Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(baseapp)!: postHandler should run regardless of result #18627

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

facundomedica
Copy link
Member

@facundomedica facundomedica commented Dec 4, 2023

Description

This PR fixes a bug discovered by @testinginprod in which post handlers were only run if the transaction execution succeeded, but they were designed to run regardless of the execution's result.

This fix is consensus breaking (especially for chains that have implemented a post handler, for the rest this shouldn't be an issue).

The original PR adding this feature: #13940


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced state machine to execute post-handlers even when transactions do not succeed, ensuring comprehensive post-transaction processing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved event handling to prevent duplication of events after post-handlers execution.
  • Tests

    • Implemented new tests to validate the behavior of post-handlers during both successful and failed message executions.

@facundomedica facundomedica requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2023 17:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update involves a significant change in the behavior of the base application's state machine. The postHandlers, which are optional routines run after message processing, are now executed regardless of whether the message execution was successful or not. This change ensures that postHandlers are consistently run, and the event handling has been adjusted to maintain the correct order and prevent duplicates. Additionally, a new test has been added to verify this updated behavior.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
baseapp/baseapp.go Modified to run postHandlers after message execution irrespective of success or failure; improved event handling to avoid duplicates.
baseapp/baseapp_test.go Added TestBaseAppPostHandler to test the new post-handler behavior on both successful and failed message execution.
CHANGELOG.md Updated to reflect changes in state machine behavior, noting that postHandlers now run on all transaction executions.

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

This comment has been minimized.

Comment on lines 938 to 962
if err == nil {
result, err = app.runMsgs(runMsgCtx, msgs, msgsV2, mode)
}
if err == nil {
// Run optional postHandlers.
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())

newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}

result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
// Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution result).
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())

newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}

result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
}

if err == nil {
if mode == execModeFinalize {
// When block gas exceeds, it'll panic and won't commit the cached store.
consumeBlockGas()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change potentially affects state.

Call sequence:

(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).runTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:811)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).deliverTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:741)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).internalFinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:699)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).FinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:856)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does affect state, good bot

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3b30e9 and 670c0d2.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • baseapp/baseapp.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/baseapp_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
baseapp/baseapp_test.go (1)
  • 597-642: The test TestBaseAppPostHandler correctly implements the intended behavior of post handlers running irrespective of the transaction outcome, which aligns with the PR objective. It verifies the post-handler execution after both successful and failed message execution.

Comment on lines 938 to 962
if err == nil {
result, err = app.runMsgs(runMsgCtx, msgs, msgsV2, mode)
}
if err == nil {
// Run optional postHandlers.
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())

newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}

result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
// Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution result).
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())

newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}

result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
}

if err == nil {
if mode == execModeFinalize {
// When block gas exceeds, it'll panic and won't commit the cached store.
consumeBlockGas()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes made in the hunk correctly implement the PR objective by ensuring that the postHandler is executed regardless of the transaction result. The logic to clear the event manager before running the postHandler to avoid duplicate events is also in place. This aligns with the intended behavior and the PR summary.

However, there is a potential issue with the ordering of events. The anteEvents are appended after the postHandler events, which could lead to incorrect event sequencing. The expected behavior would be to have anteEvents first, followed by message processing events, and finally postHandler events.

-       result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
+       result.Events = append(newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents(), result.Events...)

Committable suggestion

IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err == nil {
result, err = app.runMsgs(runMsgCtx, msgs, msgsV2, mode)
}
if err == nil {
// Run optional postHandlers.
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())
newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}
result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
// Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution result).
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())
newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}
result.Events = append(result.Events, newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents()...)
}
if err == nil {
if mode == execModeFinalize {
// When block gas exceeds, it'll panic and won't commit the cached store.
consumeBlockGas()
if err == nil {
result, err = app.runMsgs(runMsgCtx, msgs, msgsV2, mode)
}
// Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution result).
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
if app.postHandler != nil {
// The runMsgCtx context currently contains events emitted by the ante handler.
// We clear this to correctly order events without duplicates.
// Note that the state is still preserved.
postCtx := runMsgCtx.WithEventManager(sdk.NewEventManager())
newCtx, err := app.postHandler(postCtx, tx, mode == execModeSimulate, err == nil)
if err != nil {
return gInfo, nil, anteEvents, err
}
result.Events = append(newCtx.EventManager().ABCIEvents(), result.Events...)
}
if err == nil {
if mode == execModeFinalize {
// When block gas exceeds, it'll panic and won't commit the cached store.
consumeBlockGas()

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 670c0d2 and 45aafba.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)

@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/

### State Machine Breaking

* (baseapp) [#18627](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/18627) Post handlers are run on non successful transaction executions too.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Dec 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changelog entry for PR 18627 correctly reflects the changes made to the state machine behavior. However, it may be beneficial to include that this is a consensus-breaking change, as indicated in the PR objective, to ensure users are fully aware of the implications.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I second the bot's suggestion. Perhaps

Run post handlers if set, regardless of if a transaction was successful or not: consensus breaking change!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@odeke-em Thank you for the feedback. The changelog entry can be updated to:

* (baseapp) [#18627](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/18627) Run post handlers if set, regardless of if a transaction was successful or not: consensus breaking change!

This clearly communicates the consensus-breaking nature of the change.

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

We don't backport that, right? If we do, we really need to check sourcegraph to see for which chain it would be breaking.
IMHO, we should simply acknowledge it for v0.47 but fix it for v0.50.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

i dont think we can backport this as it could cause consensus breaks. if we do 0.50 then we may need to retract other versions

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

julienrbrt commented Dec 5, 2023

i dont think we can backport this as it could cause consensus breaks. if we do 0.50 then we may need to retract other versions

Given that no one has integrated with v0.50.x on prod yet, is it maybe too cautious? v0.50.2 will contain bug fixes that no one would want to skip on prod.

Copy link
Contributor

@alexanderbez alexanderbez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I've seen this talked about before. I thought we addressed it, but seems not. Thanks @facundomedica 👍

Comment on lines +631 to +641
// It should also run on failed message execution
postHandlerRun = false
tx = setFailOnHandler(t, suite.txConfig, tx, true)
txBytes, err = suite.txConfig.TxEncoder()(tx)
require.NoError(t, err)
res, err = suite.baseApp.FinalizeBlock(&abci.RequestFinalizeBlock{Height: 1, Txs: [][]byte{txBytes}})
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Empty(t, res.Events)
require.False(t, res.TxResults[0].IsOK(), fmt.Sprintf("%v", res))

require.True(t, postHandlerRun)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// It should also run on failed message execution
postHandlerRun = false
tx = setFailOnHandler(t, suite.txConfig, tx, true)
txBytes, err = suite.txConfig.TxEncoder()(tx)
require.NoError(t, err)
res, err = suite.baseApp.FinalizeBlock(&abci.RequestFinalizeBlock{Height: 1, Txs: [][]byte{txBytes}})
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Empty(t, res.Events)
require.False(t, res.TxResults[0].IsOK(), fmt.Sprintf("%v", res))
require.True(t, postHandlerRun)
// It should also run on failed message execution
postHandlerRun = false
tx = setFailOnHandler(t, suite.txConfig, tx, true)
txBytes, err = suite.txConfig.TxEncoder()(tx)
require.NoError(t, err)
res, err = suite.baseApp.FinalizeBlock(&abci.RequestFinalizeBlock{Height: 1, Txs: [][]byte{txBytes}})
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Empty(t, res.Events)
require.False(t, res.TxResults[0].IsOK(), fmt.Sprintf("%v", res))
require.True(t, postHandlerRun)

Copy link
Collaborator

@odeke-em odeke-em left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this change @facundomedica, thank you for the test as well; just some suggestions but otherwise LGTM!

Comment on lines +942 to +944
// Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution result).
//
// Note: If the postHandler fails, we also revert the runMsgs state.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think using the comment, "Run optional postHandlers (should run regardless of the execution results)" could still be as ambiguous and not what would stand out to other maintainers reading through this code. How about?

// If the postHandler is set, it MUST be ran regardless of the execution result.

@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/

### State Machine Breaking

* (baseapp) [#18627](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/18627) Post handlers are run on non successful transaction executions too.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I second the bot's suggestion. Perhaps

Run post handlers if set, regardless of if a transaction was successful or not: consensus breaking change!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title fix!: postHandler should run regardless of result fix(baseapp)!: postHandler should run regardless of result Dec 6, 2023
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release label Dec 6, 2023
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 6, 2023
@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Merging now to get this in v0.50.2 tomorrow.

Merged via the queue into main with commit b2084dc Dec 6, 2023
64 of 66 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the facu/fix-posthandler branch December 6, 2023 13:33
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
(cherry picked from commit b2084dc)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
marcello33 added a commit to 0xPolygon/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
* feat: secp256k1 public key constant time (cosmos#18026)

Signed-off-by: bizk <[email protected]>

* chore: Fixed changelog duplicated items (cosmos#18628)

* adr: Un-Ordered Transaction Inclusion (cosmos#18553)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <[email protected]>

* docs: lint ADR-070 (cosmos#18634)

* fix(baseapp)!: postHandler should run regardless of result (cosmos#18627)

* docs: fix typos in adr-007-specialization-groups.md (cosmos#18635)

* chore: alphabetize labels (cosmos#18640)

* docs(x/circuit): add note on ante handler (cosmos#18637)

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <[email protected]>

* fix: telemetry metric label variable (cosmos#18643)

* chore: typos fix (cosmos#18642)

* refactor(store/v2): updates from integration (cosmos#18633)

* build(deps): Bump actions/setup-go from 4 to 5 (cosmos#18647)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(store/v2): snapshot manager (cosmos#18458)

* chore(client/v2): fix typos in the README.md (cosmos#18657)

* fix(baseapp):  protocompat.go gogoproto.Merge does not work with custom types (cosmos#18654)

Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown>

* chore: fix several minor typos (cosmos#18660)

* chore(tools/confix/cmd): fix typo in view.go (cosmos#18659)

* refactor(x/staking): check duplicate addresses in StakeAuthorization's params (cosmos#18655)

* feat(accounts): use gogoproto API instead of protov2.  (cosmos#18653)

Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(store/commitment/iavl): honor tree.Remove error firstly (cosmos#18651)

* build(deps): Bump actions/stale from 8 to 9 (cosmos#18656)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(docs): fix typos & wording in docs (cosmos#18667)

* chore: fix several typos.   (cosmos#18666)

* feat(telemetry): enable `statsd` and `dogstatsd` telemetry sinks (cosmos#18646)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]>

* feat(store/v2): add SetInitialVersion in SC (cosmos#18665)

* feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for `keys add` (cosmos#18663)

Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>

* ci: add misspell action (cosmos#18671)

* chore: typos fix by misspell-fixer (cosmos#18683)

Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>

* chore: add v0.50.2 changelog to main (cosmos#18682)

* build(deps): Bump github.com/jhump/protoreflect from 1.15.3 to 1.15.4 in /tests (cosmos#18678)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor(bank): remove .String() calls  (cosmos#18175)

Co-authored-by: Facundo <[email protected]>

* ci: use codespell instead of misspell-fixer (cosmos#18686)

Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]>

* feat(gov): add proposal types and spam votes (cosmos#18532)

* feat(accounts): use account number as state prefix for account state (cosmos#18664)

Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown>

* chore: typos fixes by cosmos-sdk bot (cosmos#18689)

Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <[email protected]>

* feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for keys mnemonic (cosmos#18688)

* refactor: remove panic usage in keeper methods (cosmos#18636)

* ci: rename pr name in misspell job (cosmos#18693)

Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]>

* build(deps): Bump github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2 from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 in /tools/confix (cosmos#18702)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for keys export (cosmos#18684)

* feat(x/gov): better gov genesis validation (cosmos#18707)

---------

Signed-off-by: bizk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Santiago Yanzon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: yihuang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Facundo Medica <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Akaonetwo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dreamweaverxyz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pioua <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cool-developer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: leonarddt05 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: testinginprod <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown>
Co-authored-by: Sukey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: axie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Luke Ma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel T Odeke <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: 0xn4de <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: hattizai <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Devon Bear <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Halimao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cosmos SDK <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Facundo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <[email protected]>
@marcello33 marcello33 mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2024
12 tasks
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants