Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Remove skip from compute_build_matrix #492

Closed

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

Instead, fix issue #488 by changes to conda-build-all, see conda-tools/conda-build-all#82.

Currently, this PR pulls conda-build-all from my fork for demonstration. Once conda-tools/conda-build-all#82 has been merged and released, we can update the dependency of conda-smithy.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member

ocefpaf commented Mar 22, 2017

Thanks @johanneskoester this is much better then the previous fix 😉

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ install:
# Now do the things we need to do to install it.
- conda install --file requirements.txt coverage=3 python-coveralls mock python=${PYTHON} ${CONDA_PKGS} --yes --quiet -c conda-forge
- python setup.py install
- pip install git+https://github.com/johanneskoester/conda-build-all.git
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If SciTools folks takes too long to merge that we can add this as a patch on our own packaged version of conda-build-all and drop the patch once they merge it.

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Maybe cleanup the commit history a bit. Good once we have a conda-build-all package ready.

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor Author

Don't you do a squash or merge commit?

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #493.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants