-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 11 pull requests #78956
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 11 pull requests #78956
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This expands time's test suite to use more and in more places the range of methods and constants added to Duration in recent proposals for the sake of testing more API surface area and improving legibility.
Duration::ZERO composes better with match and various other things, at the cost of an occasional parens, and results in less work for the optimizer, so let's use that instead.
Duration::ZERO supercedes it in effect.
Additionally introduce storage markers for all temporaries created by the inliner. The temporary introduced for destination rebrorrow, didn't use them previously.
* `-Zinline-mir-threshold` to change the default threshold. * `-Zinline-mir-hint-threshold` to change the threshold used by functions with inline hint.
occurences -> occurrences
Duration::zero() -> Duration::ZERO In review for #72790, whether or not a constant or a function should be favored for `#![feature(duration_zero)]` was seen as an open question. In #73544 (comment) an invitation was opened to either stabilize the methods or propose a switch to the constant value, supplemented with reasoning. Followup comments suggested community preference leans towards the const ZERO, which would be reason enough. ZERO also "makes sense" beside existing associated consts for Duration. It is ever so slightly awkward to have a series of constants specifying 1 of various units but leave 0 as a method, especially when they are side-by-side in code. It seems unintuitive for the one non-dynamic value (that isn't from Default) to be not-a-const, which could hurt discoverability of the associated constants overall. Elsewhere in `std`, methods for obtaining a constant value were even deprecated, as seen with [std::u32::min_value](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html#method.min_value). Most importantly, ZERO costs less to use. A match supports a const pattern, but const fn can only be used if evaluated through a const context such as an inline `const { const_fn() }` or a `const NAME: T = const_fn()` declaration elsewhere. Likewise, while #73544 (comment) notes `Duration::zero()` can optimize to a constant value, "can" is not "will". Only const contexts have a strong promise of such. Even without that in mind, the comment in question still leans in favor of the constant for simplicity. As it costs less for a developer to use, may cost less to optimize, and seems to have more of a community consensus for it, the associated const seems best. r? ```@LukasKalbertodt```
Support enable/disable sanitizers/profiler per target This PR add options under `[target.*]` of `config.toml` which can enable or disable sanitizers/profiler runtime for corresponding target. If these options are empty, the global options under `[build]` will take effect. Fix #78329
BTreeMap: split off most code of append To complete #78056, move the last single-purpose pieces of code out of map.rs into a separate module. Also, tweaked documentation and safeness - I doubt think this code would be safe if the iterators passed in wouldn't be as sorted as the method says they should be - and bounds on MergeIterInner. r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
look at assoc ct, check the type of nodes an example where types matter are function objects, see the added test which previously passed. Now does a shallow comparison of unevaluated constants. r? ```@oli-obk```
Add flags customizing behaviour of MIR inlining * `-Zinline-mir-threshold` to change the default threshold. * `-Zinline-mir-hint-threshold` to change the threshold used by functions with inline hint. Having those as configurable flags makes it possible to experiment with with different inlining thresholds and substantially increase test coverage of MIR inlining when used with increased thresholds (for example, necessary to test #78844).
Support inlining diverging function calls The existing heuristic does penalize diverging calls to some degree, but since it never inlined them previously it might need some further modifications. Additionally introduce storage markers for all temporaries created by the inliner. The temporary introduced for destination rebrorrow, didn't use them previously.
Cleanup and comment intra-doc link pass r? ```@Manishearth``` cc ```@seeplusplus```
rustc_target: Move target env "gnu" from `linux_base` to `linux_gnu_base` Follow up to #77729. Changes the target spec hierarchy for Linux from ``` linux_base ├── linux_musl_base └── linux_uclibc_base ``` where `linux_base` is really `linux_gnu_base` and the inheriting targets replace target env "gnu" with "musl"/"uclibc" to ``` linux_base ├── linux_gnu_base ├── linux_musl_base └── linux_uclibc_base ``` which is slightly less confusing (I think).
rustc_taret: Remove `TargetOptions::is_like_android` This option was replaced by more specific options and is no longer used by the compiler.
Fix typo in comment occurences -> occurrences
Ship llvm-cov through llvm-tools `llvm-cov` is used to generate coverage report with LLVM InstrProf-based code coverage #34701. So if `llvm-cov` is shipped through llvm-tools, users can try it easily accorging to the instruction of [The Rust Unstable Book](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/source-based-code-coverage.html).
📌 Commit 61c0a2c has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Nov 11, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Nov 12, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
linux_base
tolinux_gnu_base
#78929 (rustc_target: Move target env "gnu" fromlinux_base
tolinux_gnu_base
)TargetOptions::is_like_android
#78930 (rustc_taret: RemoveTargetOptions::is_like_android
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup