BTreeMap: test chaotic ordering & other bits & bobs #78903
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
jyn514
added
A-testsuite
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #78956) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels: |
ssomers
force-pushed
the
btree_order_chaos_testing
branch
from
2dbc601 to
5bc78fb
Compare
|
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author |
ssomers
force-pushed
the
btree_order_chaos_testing
branch
from
5bc78fb to
8972bcb
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 8972bcb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#74989 (Implement `Index` and `IndexMut` for arrays) - rust-lang#76339 (Test structural matching for all range types) - rust-lang#77691 (Rename/Deprecate LayoutErr in favor of LayoutError) - rust-lang#78364 (Update RELEASES.md for 1.48.0) - rust-lang#78678 (Add tests and improve rendering of cfgs on traits) - rust-lang#78714 (Simplify output capturing) - rust-lang#78769 (Remove unneeded lifetimes in array/mod.rs) - rust-lang#78903 (BTreeMap: test chaotic ordering & other bits & bobs) - rust-lang#79032 (improve type const mismatch errors) - rust-lang#79061 (Make all rustdoc functions and structs crate-private) - rust-lang#79087 (Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to accurately describe when the error is triggered and why) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
ssomers
added a commit
to ssomers/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2020
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2020
…ulacrum BTreeMap: fix minor testing mistakes in rust-lang#78903 Mostly a duplicate test case r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2020
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76941 (Add f{32,64}::is_subnormal) - rust-lang#77697 (Split each iterator adapter and source into individual modules) - rust-lang#78305 (Stabilize alloc::Layout const functions) - rust-lang#78608 (Stabilize refcell_take) - rust-lang#78793 (Clean up `StructuralEq` docs) - rust-lang#79267 (BTreeMap: address namespace conflicts) - rust-lang#79293 (Add test for eval order for a+=b) - rust-lang#79295 (BTreeMap: fix minor testing mistakes in rust-lang#78903) - rust-lang#79297 (BTreeMap: swap the names of NodeRef::new and Root::new_leaf) - rust-lang#79299 (Stabilise `then`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum