Tests around moving parts of structs and tuples across await points #63310
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
r? @cramertj |
4 tasks
cramertj
reviewed
Aug 6, 2019
| @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | |||
| // build-pass | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: I think this and the tests below could be check-pass
|
@bors r+ Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit ef0f490 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2019
tests for async/await drop order This is just me helping out with rust-lang#62121 where I can. I'm also going to use this as a public place to collect my thoughts about what has already been done and what hasn't (adding comments to the dropbox paper doc was quickly getting spammy). I've tried to keep my commit messages similar to the line items on https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiKouT0L41mSnK1741s~TiiRAg-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy as possible. A bunch of my tests are likely to be either redundant with other tests, or lower quality than other tests that people are writing. A reasonable approach might be to tell me which commits you want to keep and I'll throw away the rest of them. The part from the dropbox paper doc that I'm concentrating on here is: (items marked with `?` are ones that I can't immediately think of how to test, so I will leave for other people. Items with checkboxes are things that I have done or will try to do next) ### Dynamic semantics - `async`/`await` with unusual locals: - ? partially uninhabited - ? conditionally initialized - ~drop impls~ already done in src/test/ui/async-await/drop-order/* - ? nested drop impls - ~partially moved (e.g., `let x = (vec![], vec![]); drop(x.0); foo.await; drop(x.1);`)~ see rust-lang#63310 - Control flow: - basic - complex - [x] `.await` while holding variables of different sizes - (possibly) drop order - [x] including drop order for locals when a future is dropped part-way through execution - Parameters' drop order is covered in my commit f40190a - ~An async fn version of `dynamic-drop.rs`~ - already done by matthewjasper in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62193/files - ? interaction with const eval, promoteds, and temporaries - [x] drop the resulting future and check that local variables and parameters are dropped in the expected order (interaction with cancellation, in other words) - also in f40190a Explanation of commits: * 0a1bdd4 is the simplest place I could think of to explicitly test `.await` while holding variables of different sizes. I'm pretty sure that this will end up being redundant with something else, so I'm happy to drop it. * f40190a is a copy-paste from `drop-order-for-async-fn-parameters.rs` with `NeverReady.await` dumped on the end of each testcase. * Normally I don't like copy-paste-based tests, but `drop-order-for-async-fn-parameters-by-ref-binding.rs` is also copy-paste, so I thought it might be okay. * [x] I'm a bit sad that this doesn't cover non-parameter locals, but I think it should be easy enough to extend in that direction, so I might have a crack at that tomorrow. * c4940e0 makes a bunch of local variables and moves them into either `{}` blocks or `async move {}` blocks, checking for any surprising differences. * I have tried to give the test functions descriptive names * I have not duplicated the tests for methods with/without self. * I think that all of these tests could be rewritten to be clearer if I could write down the expected drop order next to each test.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2019
Tests around moving parts of structs and tuples across await points r? cramertj Per the [dropbox paper](https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiR3vlp1s_Kw0yzWZ1sWMnaIAQ-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy) about more tests, it appears there are some tests wanted around local variables (under the section ["Dynamic semantics"](https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiR3vlp1s_Kw0yzWZ1sWMnaIAg-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy#:uid=122335511260129643493892&h2=Dynamic-semantics)). Here is one commit, and I can probably get code up for other scenarios listed there, although I may not have the full background to know what is being targeted by the tests. Please assist me if I'm off course, thanks! --- - Executed all 4 new tests - Executed `tidy` command
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #63034 (Fix generator size regressions due to optimization) - #63035 (Use MaybeUninit to produce more correct layouts) - #63163 (add a pair of whitespace after remove parentheses) - #63294 (tests for async/await drop order) - #63307 (don't ignore mir_dump folder) - #63308 (PlaceRef's base is already a reference) - #63310 (Tests around moving parts of structs and tuples across await points) - #63314 (doc: the content has since been moved to the guide) - #63333 (Remove unnecessary features from compiler error code list) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? cramertj
Per the dropbox paper about more tests, it appears there are some tests wanted around local variables (under the section "Dynamic semantics"). Here is one commit, and I can probably get code up for other scenarios listed there, although I may not have the full background to know what is being targeted by the tests. Please assist me if I'm off course, thanks!
tidycommand