Rollup of 9 pull requests #114294
Merged
Rollup of 9 pull requests #114294
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
refactor builtin unsize handling, extend comments r? `@compiler-errors`
Check lazy type aliases for well-formedness Previously we didn't check if `T: Mul` holds given lazy `type Alias<T> = <T as Mul>::Output;`. Now we do. It only makes sense. `@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias r? `@oli-obk`
…ds, r=spastorino
Map RPITIT's opaque type bounds back from projections to opaques
An RPITIT in a program's AST is eventually translated into both a projection GAT and an opaque. The opaque is used for default trait methods, like:
```
trait Foo {
fn bar() -> impl Sized { 0i32 }
}
```
The item bounds for both the projection and opaque are identical, and both have a *projection* self ty. This is mostly okay, since we can normalize this projection within the default trait method body to the opaque, but it does two things:
1. it leads to bugs in places where we don't normalize item bounds, like `deduce_future_output_from_obligations`
2. it leads to extra match arms that are both suspicious looking and also easy to miss
This PR maps the opaque type bounds of the RPITIT's *opaque* back to the opaque's self type to avoid this quirk. Then we can fix the UI test for rust-lang#108304 (1.) and also remove a bunch of match arms (2.).
Fixes rust-lang#108304
r? `@spastorino`
…lor-24, r=notriddle Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format Follow-up of rust-lang#111459. r? `@notriddle`
Add missing feature gate in multiple_supertrait_upcastable doc Fix rust-lang#112424
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 3114eb1fa5 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Jul 31, 2023
Merged
Open
|
Why did like half of those PRs not get included in the rollup 💀 |
|
Yeah something is weird, just noticed it now :| |
|
I guess it's fine, as long as those other PRs weren't closed by bors, they're just sitting waiting for the next rollup I guess. Maybe bors just didn't detect an unsuccessful merge, or something. |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (b3df56a): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 649.988s -> 651.412s (0.22%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup