-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make retagging work even with 'unstable' places #105317
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Dec 5, 2022
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras |
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
retag-rework
branch
from
December 5, 2022 18:13
0a14d5d
to
1b43d00
Compare
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 1b43d0083976a21cd31a5000ff346b564f232055 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 6, 2022
…retag into a separate function
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
retag-rework
branch
from
December 6, 2022 09:33
1b43d00
to
34c58e8
Compare
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2022
make retagging work even with 'unstable' places This is based on top of rust-lang#105301. Only the last two commits are new. While investigating rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#381 I realized that we would have caught this issue much earlier if the add_retag pass wouldn't bail out on assignments of the form `*ptr = ...`. So this PR changes our retag strategy: - When a new reference is created via `Rvalue::Ref` (or a raw ptr via `Rvalue::AddressOf`), we do the retagging as part of just executing that address-taking operation. - For everything else, we still insert retags -- these retags basically serve to ensure that references stored in local variables (and their fields) are always freshly tagged, so skipping this for assignments like `*ptr = ...` is less egregious. r? `@oli-obk`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2022
make retagging work even with 'unstable' places This is based on top of rust-lang#105301. Only the last two commits are new. While investigating rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#381 I realized that we would have caught this issue much earlier if the add_retag pass wouldn't bail out on assignments of the form `*ptr = ...`. So this PR changes our retag strategy: - When a new reference is created via `Rvalue::Ref` (or a raw ptr via `Rvalue::AddressOf`), we do the retagging as part of just executing that address-taking operation. - For everything else, we still insert retags -- these retags basically serve to ensure that references stored in local variables (and their fields) are always freshly tagged, so skipping this for assignments like `*ptr = ...` is less egregious. r? ``@oli-obk``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104922 (Detect long types in E0308 and write them to disk) - rust-lang#105120 (kmc-solid: `std::sys` code maintenance) - rust-lang#105255 (Make nested RPIT inherit the parent opaque's generics.) - rust-lang#105317 (make retagging work even with 'unstable' places) - rust-lang#105405 (Stop passing -export-dynamic to wasm-ld.) - rust-lang#105408 (Add help for `#![feature(impl_trait_in_fn_trait_return)]`) - rust-lang#105423 (Use `Symbol` for the crate name instead of `String`/`str`) - rust-lang#105433 (CI: add missing line continuation marker) - rust-lang#105434 (Fix warning when libcore is compiled with no_fp_fmt_parse) - rust-lang#105441 (Remove `UnsafetyState`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
make retagging work even with 'unstable' places This is based on top of rust-lang#105301. Only the last two commits are new. While investigating rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#381 I realized that we would have caught this issue much earlier if the add_retag pass wouldn't bail out on assignments of the form `*ptr = ...`. So this PR changes our retag strategy: - When a new reference is created via `Rvalue::Ref` (or a raw ptr via `Rvalue::AddressOf`), we do the retagging as part of just executing that address-taking operation. - For everything else, we still insert retags -- these retags basically serve to ensure that references stored in local variables (and their fields) are always freshly tagged, so skipping this for assignments like `*ptr = ...` is less egregious. r? ```@oli-obk```
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104922 (Detect long types in E0308 and write them to disk) - rust-lang#105120 (kmc-solid: `std::sys` code maintenance) - rust-lang#105255 (Make nested RPIT inherit the parent opaque's generics.) - rust-lang#105317 (make retagging work even with 'unstable' places) - rust-lang#105405 (Stop passing -export-dynamic to wasm-ld.) - rust-lang#105408 (Add help for `#![feature(impl_trait_in_fn_trait_return)]`) - rust-lang#105423 (Use `Symbol` for the crate name instead of `String`/`str`) - rust-lang#105433 (CI: add missing line continuation marker) - rust-lang#105434 (Fix warning when libcore is compiled with no_fp_fmt_parse) - rust-lang#105441 (Remove `UnsafetyState`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly. For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now? For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly. For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now? For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly. For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now? For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly. For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now? For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly. For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now? For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is based on top of #105301. Only the last two commits are new.
While investigating rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#381 I realized that we would have caught this issue much earlier if the add_retag pass wouldn't bail out on assignments of the form
*ptr = ...
.So this PR changes our retag strategy:
Rvalue::Ref
(or a raw ptr viaRvalue::AddressOf
), we do the retagging as part of just executing that address-taking operation.*ptr = ...
is less egregious.r? @oli-obk