Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HRMP] Make max_message_size adjustable #3145

Open
ggwpez opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[HRMP] Make max_message_size adjustable #3145

ggwpez opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@ggwpez
Copy link
Member

ggwpez commented Jan 30, 2024

HRMP channels have a max_message_size and will possibly trunc/drop messages that are longer than this.
I order to prepare for the revival of #2302, there needs to be a way to reduce the max_message_size of all open channels since the Message Queue would otherwise fail to enqueue them.

One possible way to do this between Alice (requesting a change to MMS) and Bob counter-party:

  • Alice: RequestConfigUpdate(MaxMessageSize(123)). This will be called ReqId for brevity.
  • Bob:
    • Ok(ReqId) if the new MMS value is larger or equal to the old one.
    • TentativeOk(ReqId, LatestRelayBlockNumber) otherwise and adjusts the limits locally.
  • Alice: waits until LatestRelayBlockNumber has elapsed and adjusts the limits locally.
@franciscoaguirre
Copy link
Contributor

franciscoaguirre commented Apr 11, 2024

Would those be XCM instructions?

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2024
Re-applying #2302 after increasing the `MaxPageSize`.  

Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
#323

Changes:
- Limit the number of messages and signals a HRMP channel can have at
most.
- Limit the number of HRML channels.

A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
bumped to 5 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.

## Integration

If you see this error in your try-runtime-cli:  
```pre
Max message size for channel is too large. This means that the V5 migration can be front-run and an
attacker could place a large message just right before the migration to make other messages un-decodable.
Please either increase `MaxPageSize` or decrease the `max_message_size` for this channel. Channel max:
102400, MaxPageSize: 65535
```

Then increase the `MaxPageSize` of the `cumulus_pallet_xcmp_queue` to
something like this:
```rust
type MaxPageSize = ConstU32<{ 103 * 1024 }>;
```

There is currently no easy way for on-chain governance to adjust the
HRMP max message size of all channels, but it could be done:
#3145.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
hitchhooker pushed a commit to ibp-network/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2024
Re-applying paritytech#2302 after increasing the `MaxPageSize`.  

Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
paritytech#323

Changes:
- Limit the number of messages and signals a HRMP channel can have at
most.
- Limit the number of HRML channels.

A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
bumped to 5 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.

## Integration

If you see this error in your try-runtime-cli:  
```pre
Max message size for channel is too large. This means that the V5 migration can be front-run and an
attacker could place a large message just right before the migration to make other messages un-decodable.
Please either increase `MaxPageSize` or decrease the `max_message_size` for this channel. Channel max:
102400, MaxPageSize: 65535
```

Then increase the `MaxPageSize` of the `cumulus_pallet_xcmp_queue` to
something like this:
```rust
type MaxPageSize = ConstU32<{ 103 * 1024 }>;
```

There is currently no easy way for on-chain governance to adjust the
HRMP max message size of all channels, but it could be done:
paritytech#3145.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
@ggwpez
Copy link
Member Author

ggwpez commented Jul 4, 2024

Would those be XCM instructions?

Could be, for a start i would probably go with a new extrinsic + transact.

TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2024
Re-applying paritytech#2302 after increasing the `MaxPageSize`.  

Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
paritytech#323

Changes:
- Limit the number of messages and signals a HRMP channel can have at
most.
- Limit the number of HRML channels.

A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
bumped to 5 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.

## Integration

If you see this error in your try-runtime-cli:  
```pre
Max message size for channel is too large. This means that the V5 migration can be front-run and an
attacker could place a large message just right before the migration to make other messages un-decodable.
Please either increase `MaxPageSize` or decrease the `max_message_size` for this channel. Channel max:
102400, MaxPageSize: 65535
```

Then increase the `MaxPageSize` of the `cumulus_pallet_xcmp_queue` to
something like this:
```rust
type MaxPageSize = ConstU32<{ 103 * 1024 }>;
```

There is currently no easy way for on-chain governance to adjust the
HRMP max message size of all channels, but it could be done:
paritytech#3145.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
@ggwpez
Copy link
Member Author

ggwpez commented Sep 24, 2024

Easier way to do this is to first reduce the limit on the sender side and then on the receiver manually.

Could be done by modifying RelevantMessagingState -> egress_channels -> AbridgedHrmpChannel -> max_message_size.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants