Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove "type" parameter from chainHead_storage #17

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 15, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

@tomaka tomaka commented Jul 27, 2022

Fix #6

It is at the moment not possible to request on the network level the hash or size of a storage value.

In the future it might be, but once that is possible we should simply bump the chainHead API version.

@tomaka tomaka merged commit 8001d6d into paritytech:main Aug 15, 2022
@tomaka tomaka deleted the fix-6 branch August 15, 2022 08:24
mergify bot pushed a commit to paritytech/smoldot that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2022
In complement with #2812, this
PR updates `chainHead_unstable_storage` with the latest changes in the
JSON-RPC API:
paritytech/json-rpc-interface-spec#16 and
paritytech/json-rpc-interface-spec#17

We should now be up to date.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chainHead_storage: is the "type" really useful?
1 participant