-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consensus min gas fee of .0025 uosmo #4244
Merged
+348
−194
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dfe43ca
Refactor tests a bit
ValarDragon 38946b7
Add consensus min gas fee
ValarDragon c676d48
Fix tests
ValarDragon 923b45e
Delete more crud
ValarDragon 7a82e14
Cleanup more duplicate test cases
ValarDragon 125d59d
flip isCheckTx sign
ValarDragon 13679ce
One more test needed
ValarDragon 295aebb
Run invalid fee denom test across both check & deliver
ValarDragon a374529
Remove extra line
ValarDragon 8c7f27d
Merge branch 'main' into dev/consensus_min_gas_fee
ValarDragon e42e675
Add hack to get around txfee problem in ibctesting
ValarDragon f40b0c7
Handle genesis
ValarDragon b278a48
Minor code cleanup
ValarDragon 5db078c
tryfix simulation
ValarDragon a8b5c4c
Fix for legacy simulator
ValarDragon 275cfb8
Update x/txfees/keeper/feedecorator_test.go
ValarDragon e7db7e1
Apply matt comments
ValarDragon 1896d2e
See what happens by adding fees
ValarDragon f3ffdcb
Merge branch 'main' into dev/consensus_min_gas_fee
ValarDragon bf1b8bc
Add genesis logic update
ValarDragon 81ea3fd
Try fixing e2e
ValarDragon efe1326
Add some better logging to find error
ValarDragon 540eaff
remove stat, fix typo
ValarDragon 63c07fa
fix(e2e): fix e2e test for consensus min gas fee #4244 (#4317)
p0mvn af6f4a0
Temp disable geo twap E2E
ValarDragon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was this done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was a driveby change to get the execution stack to have one entry point. (At the time I did this line, I thought I'd do the gas if statement in this method, ended up not doing that)
So can be reverted, but looks identical to the ExecTxCmd as far as I can tell?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I think this is fine, was getting sidetracked by this but the change LGTM now.
I think I found the main problem. Should have the fix soon