feat: Add safety check: restriction fn in bank module for mint perms

[mattverse]

Description

Closes: #48

This PR adds feature to the bank module so that other modules using bankKeeper would be able to call the keeper with restricted permissions when minting coins. WithMintCoinsRestriction would be able to get called within app.go when setting keeper components for each individual keeper, taking a function that would validate minting denom as an argument.

The example below demonstrates adding bank module with restricted permissions.

	app.DistrKeeper = distrkeeper.NewKeeper(
		appCodec, keys[distrtypes.StoreKey], app.GetSubspace(distrtypes.ModuleName), app.AccountKeeper, app.BankKeeper.WithMintCoinsRestriction(DistributionMintingRestriction),
		&stakingKeeper, authtypes.FeeCollectorName, app.ModuleAccountAddrs(),
	)

while there would be a seperate function that would restrict and validate allowed denoms as such.

func DistributionMintingRestriction(ctx sdk.Context, coins sdk.Coins) errors {
  for _, coin := range coins {
    if coin.Denom != ctx.NativeStakingDenom {
       return errors.New(fmt.Sprintf("Distribution can only print denom %s, tried minting %s", ctx.NativeStakingDenom, coin.Denom))
     }
  }
}

The sdk's simapp currently does not have any keepers that are to be changed with this implementation added, thus remaining unchanged in app.go.

Originally from: cosmos#10771

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)