Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: mark test-dgram-multicast-ssmv6-multi-process flaky #33498

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AshCripps
Copy link
Member

refs: #32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux as its been failing test-commit-custom-suites-freestylefor a while

Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label May 21, 2020
refs: nodejs#32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux
Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file
@AshCripps AshCripps force-pushed the mark-flaky-dgram-test branch from 0a62fca to eaef98e Compare May 21, 2020 15:21
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Member

@richardlau richardlau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM. Since this is in internet this must be failing during the daily runs? In which case you may need to check how that job is treating flaky tests (i.e. is --flaky-tests= being set for the test harness).

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

the daily triggers this through https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-custom-suites-freestyle/configure, and it looks good

python tools/test.py -j $JOBS -p tap --logfile test.tap --mode=release --flaky-tests=dontcare $TEST_ARGS $CI_JS_SUITES

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

I propose fast-tracking if CI is green for the PR.

@sam-github sam-github added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label May 21, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sam-github pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2020
refs: #32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux
Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file

PR-URL: #33498
Refs: #32946
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

Landed in e14786f

@sam-github sam-github closed this May 22, 2020
@AshCripps AshCripps deleted the mark-flaky-dgram-test branch May 22, 2020 21:42
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2020
refs: #32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux
Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file

PR-URL: #33498
Refs: #32946
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2020
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
refs: #32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux
Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file

PR-URL: #33498
Refs: #32946
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
refs: #32946

Mark this test as flaky on linux
Ive used sequential.status as a template for this file

PR-URL: #33498
Refs: #32946
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants