Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding streamable flag to tesInput #157

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

Adding streamable flag to tesInput #157

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2022

Conversation

kellrott
Copy link
Member

@kellrott kellrott commented Sep 2, 2021

Closes #156

@kellrott kellrott added this to the 1.1 milestone Sep 2, 2021
using a streaming mount, as opposed to downloading the whole file to
the local scratch space, may be faster despite the latency and
overhead. This does not mean that the backend will use a streaming
interface, as it may not be provided by the vendor, but it the
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small typo: "...but iF the capacity is avaIlable..."

Copy link
Contributor

@aniewielska aniewielska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does streamable make sense for inputs only or outputs as well?

@vsmalladi
Copy link
Contributor

@aniewielska I think inputs only makes sense. Since the goal is to either download the files or not. Outputs need to be published so they can be captured later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants