Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some minor perf improvements #16941

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Some minor perf improvements #16941

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nojaf
Copy link
Contributor

@nojaf nojaf commented Mar 23, 2024

Description

Some things that got detected by the work happening in ionide/ionide-analyzers#85

Checklist

  • Test cases added

  • Performance benchmarks added in case of performance changes

  • Release notes entry updated:

    Please make sure to add an entry with short succinct description of the change as well as link to this pull request to the respective release notes file, if applicable.

    Release notes files:

    • If anything under src/Compiler has been changed, please make sure to make an entry in docs/release-notes/.FSharp.Compiler.Service/<version>.md, where <version> is usually "highest" one, e.g. 42.8.200
    • If language feature was added (i.e. LanguageFeatures.fsi was changed), please add it to docs/releae-notes/.Language/preview.md
    • If a change to FSharp.Core was made, please make sure to edit docs/release-notes/.FSharp.Core/<version>.md where version is "highest" one, e.g. 8.0.200.

    Information about the release notes entries format can be found in the documentation.
    Example:

    If you believe that release notes are not necessary for this PR, please add NO_RELEASE_NOTES label to the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

❗ Release notes required

@nojaf,

Caution

No release notes found for the changed paths (see table below).

Please make sure to add an entry with an informative description of the change as well as link to this pull request, issue and language suggestion if applicable. Release notes for this repository are based on Keep A Changelog format.

The following format is recommended for this repository:

* <Informative description>. ([PR #XXXXX](https://github.com/dotnet/fsharp/pull/XXXXX))

See examples in the files, listed in the table below or in th full documentation at https://fsharp.github.io/fsharp-compiler-docs/release-notes/About.html.

If you believe that release notes are not necessary for this PR, please add NO_RELEASE_NOTES label to the pull request.

You can open this PR in browser to add release notes: open in github.dev

Change path Release notes path Description
src/Compiler docs/release-notes/.FSharp.Compiler.Service/8.0.300.md No release notes found or release notes format is not correct

@@ -3215,7 +3215,7 @@ let count f arr =
module FileSystemUtilities =
open System.Reflection
open System.Globalization
let progress = try Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("FSharp_DebugSetFilePermissions") <> null with _ -> false
let progress = try not (isNull (Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("FSharp_DebugSetFilePermissions"))) with _ -> false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isNotNull ?

let inline isNotNull (x: 'T) = not (isNull x)

@@ -54,11 +54,12 @@ module AttributeHelpers =
| Some(Attrib(_, _, [ AttribBoolArg p ], _, _, _, _)) -> Some p
| _ -> None

[<return: Struct>]
let (|ILVersion|_|) (versionString: string) =
Copy link
Member

@vzarytovskii vzarytovskii Mar 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are covered in @psfinaki PR likely, and we decided to wait with changes for a bit, since we already have some SO reports in compiler and those need careful verification.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reason to postpone it is here: #16316 (comment)
There were stackoverflows when allocating more things on stack in certain cases. We will need to make sure we aren't hitting (or won't be hitting) it with AP changes.

@nojaf nojaf closed this Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants