-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run sanitizers on CI #591
Merged
Run sanitizers on CI #591
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ | ||
#!/bin/bash | ||
|
||
cd "$(dirname "$0")"/.. | ||
set -ex | ||
|
||
if [[ "$OSTYPE" != "linux"* ]]; then | ||
exit 0 | ||
fi | ||
|
||
rustup component add rust-src | ||
|
||
# Run address sanitizer | ||
# https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/issues/614 | ||
export ASAN_OPTIONS="detect_leaks=0" | ||
cargo clean | ||
# TODO: Once `cfg(sanitize = "..")` is stable, replace | ||
# `cfg(crossbeam_sanitize)` with `cfg(sanitize = "..")` and remove | ||
# `--cfg crossbeam_sanitize`. | ||
RUSTFLAGS="-Dwarnings -Zsanitizer=address --cfg crossbeam_sanitize" \ | ||
cargo test --all --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --tests --exclude benchmarks -- --test-threads=1 | ||
|
||
cargo clean | ||
RUSTFLAGS="-Dwarnings -Zsanitizer=address --cfg crossbeam_sanitize" \ | ||
cargo run \ | ||
--release \ | ||
--target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \ | ||
--features nightly \ | ||
--example sanitize \ | ||
--manifest-path crossbeam-epoch/Cargo.toml | ||
|
||
# Run memory sanitizer | ||
cargo clean | ||
RUSTFLAGS="-Dwarnings -Zsanitizer=memory --cfg crossbeam_sanitize" \ | ||
cargo test -Zbuild-std --all --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --tests --exclude benchmarks -- --test-threads=1 | ||
|
||
# Run thread sanitizer | ||
export TSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=$(pwd)/ci/tsan" | ||
cargo clean | ||
RUSTFLAGS="-Dwarnings -Zsanitizer=thread --cfg crossbeam_sanitize" \ | ||
cargo test -Zbuild-std --all --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --tests --exclude benchmarks -- --test-threads=1 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
# TSAN suppressions file for crossbeam | ||
|
||
# The epoch-based GC uses fences. | ||
race:crossbeam_epoch | ||
|
||
# Push and steal operations in crossbeam-deque may cause data races, but such | ||
# data races are safe. If a data race happens, the value read by `steal` is | ||
# forgotten and the steal operation is then retried. | ||
race:crossbeam_deque*push | ||
race:crossbeam_deque*steal | ||
|
||
# Non-lock-free AtomicCell uses SeqLock which uses fences. | ||
race:crossbeam_utils::atomic::atomic_cell::AtomicCell<T>::compare_exchange |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why this test fails when we reduce
internal::MAX_OBJECTS
, but it also fails when I run a normal test with--cfg crossbeam_sanitize
. (And, except forcfg(test)
code,cfg(crossbeam_sanitize)
only changesinternal::MAX_OBJECTS
.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's worth reporting in a separate issue. @taiki-e would you please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense. I've filed #662.