Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(depinject): support 08 wasm #6188

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

Description

ref: #3560


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ func NewSimApp(
mockModule,

// IBC light clients
wasm.NewAppModule(app.WasmClientKeeper), // TODO(damian): see if we want to pass the lightclient module here, keeper is used in AppModule.RegisterServices etc
wasm.NewAppModule(wasmLightClientModule), // TODO(damian): see if we want to pass the lightclient module here, keeper is used in AppModule.RegisterServices etc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed as per todo. unsure if people want to keep keeper for some reason I am not seeing? Will rm the TODO.

authority = authtypes.NewModuleAddressOrBech32Address(in.Config.Authority)
}

keeper := wasmkeeper.NewKeeperWithVM(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is kinda troublesome. We could create a struct that encapsulates the config/vm/use mock vm boolean flag? I'd also need to check sdk code to see if there's cases where two different sigs for a keeper exist.

Open to ideas if anyone has em!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can check some more in depth later today, we can also bring this up tomorrow when syncing with the sdk team.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not seeing anything equivalent. Best I can see is using optional arguments for vm and vm config and making a decision based on their presence.

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega added the priority PRs that need prompt reviews label Apr 22, 2024
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim force-pushed the jim/3560-depinject-support-08-wasm branch from 1c13068 to 50eb53f Compare April 23, 2024 11:50
in.Cdc, in.StoreService, in.ClientKeeper, authority.String(), in.VM, in.QueryRouter, in.Opts...,
)
} else {
// TODO(jim): If missing, its default value is used. This could very well be surprising and cause misconfiguration
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim Apr 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess if default value initialized the config dataDir would be "" which would be non-sensical? Could add validation on config and handle this?

(Note: default value/zero init for interface VM will be nil)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If dataDir is "" maybe an error is already returned in the call to wasmvm.NewVM?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

most likely! Would be nice to preempt it and return a better error though.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can leave this TODO here and address it afterwards

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed for 'ibc-go'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, fine merging this to move forward and come back to it if needed later on.

in.Cdc, in.StoreService, in.ClientKeeper, authority.String(), in.VM, in.QueryRouter, in.Opts...,
)
} else {
// TODO(jim): If missing, its default value is used. This could very well be surprising and cause misconfiguration
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If dataDir is "" maybe an error is already returned in the call to wasmvm.NewVM?

@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

I am going to merge this for now, any improvements can be handled in follow up PRs.

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 29adc7b into feat/depinject Apr 29, 2024
84 checks passed
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the jim/3560-depinject-support-08-wasm branch April 29, 2024 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority PRs that need prompt reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants