-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 628
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(depinject): add buf gen pulsar #5968
Conversation
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
We could also just use this |
Is the feat/depinject target branch clean? And up to date with main? |
Yes and yes! |
This msg is displayed in my shell when I run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I mentioned in #5968 (comment), we should no longer need pulsar with the next release. My thinking is that we can go ahead with this for now and add the pulsar codegen but when it works with gogoproto we just remove what's not needed and swap it out - should produce diffs to the codegen (i.e. removing the protov2 msg APIs and back to v1 with gogoproto - from what I understand this relates the reflection apis which are used in protobuf and sdk)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
200k diff, quick skim, lgtm
Actually, scratch that. Can't get this to build locally still. Is cd-ing into Looking into this more, some imports don't seem to be generated correctly? E.g, the import for the base account our interchain account wraps points to The correct type is apparently located in
|
Same experience for me.
Very possible, I can try to look into this a bit more. |
we should add a workflow for |
Oh, I hadn't even tried that... Does building work in the api folder of the SDK? |
yup! I think our |
plugins: | ||
- name: go-pulsar | ||
out: ../api | ||
opt: Mcosmos/app/v1alpha1/module.proto=cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/app/v1alpha1,Mcosmos/ics23/v1/proofs.proto=github.com/cosmos/ics23/go/api |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems to be the way to link the api module?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I think this is how you do overriding.
maybe @julienrbrt could give us a more detailed description so we have a better understanding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be perfectly happy to merge. Since we know where the build issues were, this can be tested locally for the time being.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
plugins: | ||
- name: go-pulsar | ||
out: ../api | ||
opt: Mcosmos/app/v1alpha1/module.proto=cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/app/v1alpha1,Mcosmos/ics23/v1/proofs.proto=github.com/cosmos/ics23/go/api |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I think this is how you do overriding.
maybe @julienrbrt could give us a more detailed description so we have a better understanding.
Quality Gate passed for 'ibc-go'Issues Measures |
Great work taking this to the finish line, @damiannolan and @DimitrisJim. 👏 |
Description
api
.ref: #3560
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the GitHub PR explorer.SonarCloud Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.