feat: implement low-level dependency injection container

[aaronc]

Description

closes #9775
needs #9658

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[orijbot]

Visit https://dashboard.github.orijtech.com?pr=9666&repo=cosmos%2Fcosmos-sdk to see benchmark details.

[jgimeno]

I would extract the logging and the graphing from the options struct. I see the config used only to configure the container. As it is done when constructing with autoGroupTypes and onePerScope types.

[aaronc]

Where I would put them instead?

[aaronc]

The alternative would be adding a parameter or overload to Run just with debugging options separate from the container options. But that feels relatively involved. If you think it's useful to separate how about we align on an API and do that in a follow-up PR?

[aaronc]

@blushi @jgimeno I've addressed the review comments. Let me know if you can take a look and we can move forward. @jgimeno is okay to deal with debug options later or leave as is?

[aaronc]

I've fixed the issues with auto-group and one-per-scope types in #10222. I'm making progress on #9862. Can we merge this now?

I think I might want to pull the logging stuff out of Option but let's do that separately.

[blushi]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9666 (9736a06) into master (d07e416) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 9736a06 differs from pull request most recent head 30b21ea. Consider uploading reports for the commit 30b21ea to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9666      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.73%   63.65%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         572      573       +1     
  Lines       53966    53761     -205     
==========================================
- Hits        34397    34222     -175     
+ Misses      17612    17590      -22     
+ Partials     1957     1949       -8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
baseapp/state.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-50.00%)	⬇️
x/auth/middleware/index_events.go	39.28% <0.00%> (-35.72%)	⬇️
x/bank/types/key.go	82.35% <0.00%> (-17.65%)	⬇️
x/auth/middleware/run_msgs.go	58.18% <0.00%> (-12.09%)	⬇️
client/keys/list.go	67.85% <0.00%> (-10.72%)	⬇️
baseapp/grpcrouter.go	79.72% <0.00%> (-6.21%)	⬇️
x/auth/middleware/gas.go	64.70% <0.00%> (-5.89%)	⬇️
x/auth/middleware/recovery.go	58.82% <0.00%> (-5.89%)	⬇️
server/mock/app.go	78.75% <0.00%> (-4.98%)	⬇️
x/auth/tx/mode_handler.go	78.94% <0.00%> (-2.01%)	⬇️
... and 59 more

[fdymylja]

LGTM. No strong opinion on https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/9666/files#r710071800. But I tend to agree to split logging/graphing functionality from the logic functionality, since overall what happens is not easy to follow I'd try to keep the functionality scope of components as small as possible.