-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
style: lint go and markdown (backport #10060) #10473
style: lint go and markdown (backport #10060) #10473
Conversation
## Description + fixing `x/bank/migrations/v44.migrateDenomMetadata` - we could potentially put a wrong data in a new key if the old keys have variable length. + linting the code Putting in the same PR because i found the issue when running a linter. Depends on: #10112 --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 479485f) # Conflicts: # CODING_GUIDELINES.md # CONTRIBUTING.md # STABLE_RELEASES.md # contrib/rosetta/README.md # cosmovisor/README.md # crypto/keyring/keyring.go # db/README.md # docs/404.md # docs/DOCS_README.md # docs/architecture/adr-038-state-listening.md # docs/architecture/adr-040-storage-and-smt-state-commitments.md # docs/architecture/adr-043-nft-module.md # docs/architecture/adr-044-protobuf-updates-guidelines.md # docs/architecture/adr-046-module-params.md # docs/migrations/pre-upgrade.md # docs/migrations/rest.md # docs/ru/README.md # docs/run-node/rosetta.md # docs/run-node/run-node.md # docs/run-node/run-testnet.md # go.mod # scripts/module-tests.sh # snapshots/README.md # store/streaming/README.md # store/streaming/file/README.md # store/v2/flat/store.go # store/v2/smt/store.go # x/auth/ante/sigverify.go # x/auth/middleware/basic.go # x/auth/spec/01_concepts.md # x/auth/spec/05_vesting.md # x/auth/spec/07_client.md # x/authz/spec/05_client.md # x/bank/spec/README.md # x/crisis/spec/05_client.md # x/distribution/spec/README.md # x/epoching/keeper/keeper.go # x/epoching/spec/03_to_improve.md # x/evidence/spec/07_client.md # x/feegrant/spec/README.md # x/gov/spec/01_concepts.md # x/gov/spec/07_client.md # x/group/internal/orm/spec/01_table.md # x/mint/spec/06_client.md # x/slashing/spec/09_client.md # x/slashing/spec/README.md # x/staking/spec/09_client.md # x/upgrade/spec/04_client.md
@robert-zaremba could you resolve the conflicts here ? |
seems like this PR has some conflicts @robert-zaremba |
Ping @robert-zaremba. Marking as draft for now. |
Will clean the conflicts. Initially I didn't want to backport this PR, but someone added a lablel. |
There were a lot of changes not related to v0.44, eg: ae8645b |
* style: lint go and markdown (cosmos#10060) ## Description + fixing `x/bank/migrations/v44.migrateDenomMetadata` - we could potentially put a wrong data in a new key if the old keys have variable length. + linting the code Putting in the same PR because i found the issue when running a linter. Depends on: cosmos#10112 --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 479485f) # Conflicts: # CODING_GUIDELINES.md # CONTRIBUTING.md # STABLE_RELEASES.md # contrib/rosetta/README.md # cosmovisor/README.md # crypto/keyring/keyring.go # db/README.md # docs/404.md # docs/DOCS_README.md # docs/architecture/adr-038-state-listening.md # docs/architecture/adr-040-storage-and-smt-state-commitments.md # docs/architecture/adr-043-nft-module.md # docs/architecture/adr-044-protobuf-updates-guidelines.md # docs/architecture/adr-046-module-params.md # docs/migrations/pre-upgrade.md # docs/migrations/rest.md # docs/ru/README.md # docs/run-node/rosetta.md # docs/run-node/run-node.md # docs/run-node/run-testnet.md # go.mod # scripts/module-tests.sh # snapshots/README.md # store/streaming/README.md # store/streaming/file/README.md # store/v2/flat/store.go # store/v2/smt/store.go # x/auth/ante/sigverify.go # x/auth/middleware/basic.go # x/auth/spec/01_concepts.md # x/auth/spec/05_vesting.md # x/auth/spec/07_client.md # x/authz/spec/05_client.md # x/bank/spec/README.md # x/crisis/spec/05_client.md # x/distribution/spec/README.md # x/epoching/keeper/keeper.go # x/epoching/spec/03_to_improve.md # x/evidence/spec/07_client.md # x/feegrant/spec/README.md # x/gov/spec/01_concepts.md # x/gov/spec/07_client.md # x/group/internal/orm/spec/01_table.md # x/mint/spec/06_client.md # x/slashing/spec/09_client.md # x/slashing/spec/README.md # x/staking/spec/09_client.md # x/upgrade/spec/04_client.md * fix conflicts * remove unnecessary files Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]>
This is an automatic backport of pull request #10060 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 479485f has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refresh
will re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebase
will rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio update
will merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>
will backport this PR on<destination>
branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/