-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editline fix #1949
Editline fix #1949
Conversation
Created branch |
Note this will introduce a conflict when merging release back to develop due to #1946, it's unavoidable though. Not a big deal anyway. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editline is not available in MinGW. I guess this fix will break MinGW build.
It seems that Editline is now available in MinGW
I'm confused. In bitshares/bitshares-fc#125 editline for MinGW got removed (it's in release notes of 3.2.0). In bitshares/bitshares-fc#121 editline for MinGW is re-added with no comment, is it correct? @crypto-ape please check. More info in issue #1724. |
Also desire for @cwyyprog to review/comment on this issue related to Editline now available in MinGW. It seems you are familiar with building with MinGW. Are you able to build successfully and include Editline? |
@crypto-ape can you reach me on TG or WC? I use the same username as GH on those as well. Thanks. |
Not really. Editline is in/excluded here depending on the Note: please keep this PR open for now, we may need to bump fc again for #1952 |
Thanks @pmconrad, that is exactly it. Before, there was a mismatch between the use of As @pmconrad commented, IIRC I have compiled it successfully with MinGW on both Linux and Windows. |
Thanks for the clarification. |
Fix #1948 in release and fix #1952 by bumping fc.
Note the bump is not to fc/master but only includes the fix.