- Sponsor
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 512
TypeScript Code Coverage Task? #278
Comments
Has this actually been implemented in the TypeScript skeleton? |
Yes, in both the Webpack skeletons. There's a pull request open regarding
|
@niieani looks like the PR is for esnext not typescript |
I'm gonna look in to this today |
@AshleyGrant I'll talk to you in the Gitter chat, but I have some work here which might help adding in coverage to the Karma testing. |
Hey guys. Any headway here? Is there a branch somewhere that might have some work completed already that we can leech off of? |
There's a discussion here, re. the parallel ESNext support: #519. |
I was able to get coverage working of my typescript files using the Aurelia CLI, but have run into an issue: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39650904/how-do-i-get-the-aurelia-cli-to-provide-a-stack-trace-on-a-gulp-plugin-error |
@Roustalski I've tried to clone your repo but it spits out an empty coverage for me.. It seems like The ESNext skeleton uses @niieani can you elaborate on how you would plan to use |
Stale since 2016 |
@Alexander-Taran I've tried a few times to get this working with my project and failed, last time I got an error similar to this repro. Somewhat related from the CLI repo. |
Thanks @mttmccb |
I too have run into this issue when updating from 0.33.1 to 0.35.1. I use typescript as well |
Are there any plans to implement code coverage in the Aurelia TypeScript Skeleton like there is in the standard ES Skeleton? I ask because there is the isparta dependency in the package,json, but it is not being used. I would love to implement code coverage into my app, but not sure where TypeScript falls into this. I know testing was a pain to get working in the first place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: