Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Implementing lull reporting at bundle level processing" #30648

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

arvindram03
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #29882

@arvindram03
Copy link
Contributor Author

the failures are unrelated.

Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@arvindram03
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @johnjcasey added as fallback since no labels match configuration

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@scwhittle scwhittle closed this Mar 18, 2024
@scwhittle scwhittle reopened this Mar 18, 2024
@scwhittle scwhittle merged commit 50c5991 into apache:master Mar 18, 2024
37 of 38 checks passed
Abacn pushed a commit to Abacn/beam that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
Abacn added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
hjtran pushed a commit to hjtran/beam that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants