Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @types/mocha to v5 #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2018
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 8, 2018

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change References
@​types/mocha devDependencies major 2.2.48 -> 5.2.5 source
mocha devDependencies major 4.1.0 -> 5.2.0 homepage, source

Release Notes

mochajs/mocha

v5.2.0

Compare Source

🎉 Enhancements

🐛 Fixes

📖 Documentation

🔩 Other

v5.1.1

Compare Source

🐛 Fixes

  • #​3325: Revert change which broke --watch ([@​boneskull])

v5.1.0

Compare Source

🎉 Enhancements

🐛 Fixes

📖 Documentation

🔩 Other

v5.0.5

Compare Source

Welcome @​outsideris to the team!

🐛 Fixes

📖 Documentation

🔩 Other

v5.0.4

Compare Source

🐛 Fixes

v5.0.3

Compare Source

This patch features a fix to address a potential "low severity" ReDoS vulnerability in the diff package (a dependency of Mocha).

🔒 Security Fixes

🔩 Other

v5.0.2

Compare Source

This release fixes a class of tests which report as false positives. Certain tests will now break, though they would have previously been reported as passing. Details below. Sorry for the inconvenience!

🐛 Fixes

  • #​3226: Do not swallow errors that are thrown asynchronously from passing tests ([@​boneskull]). Example:

    it('should actually fail, sorry!', function (done) {
      // passing assertion
      assert(true === true);
    
      // test complete & is marked as passing
      done();
    
      // ...but something evil lurks within
      setTimeout(() => {
        throw new Error('chaos!');
      }, 100);
    });

    Previously to this version, Mocha would have silently swallowed the chaos! exception, and you wouldn't know. Well, now you know. Mocha cannot recover from this gracefully, so it will exit with a nonzero code.

    Maintainers of external reporters: If a test of this class is encountered, the Runner instance will emit the end event twice; you may need to change your reporter to use runner.once('end') intead of runner.on('end').

  • #​3093: Fix stack trace reformatting problem (@​outsideris)

🔩 Other

v5.0.1

Compare Source

...your garden-variety patch release.

Special thanks to Wallaby.js for their continued support! ❤️

🐛 Fixes

📖 Documentation

🔩 Other

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Mocha starts off 2018 right by again dropping support for unmaintained rubbish.

Welcome @​vkarpov15 to the team!

💥 Breaking Changes

  • #​3148: Drop support for IE9 and IE10 ([@​Bamieh])
    Practically speaking, only code which consumes (through bundling or otherwise) the userland buffer module should be affected. However, Mocha will no longer test against these browsers, nor apply fixes for them.

🎉 Enhancements

🐛 Fixes

😎 Developer Experience

📖 Documentation

🔩 Other

  • #​3118: Move TextMate Integration to its own repo ([@​Bamieh])
  • #​3185: Add Node.js v9 to build matrix; remove v7 ([@​xxczaki])
  • #​3172: Markdown linting ([@​boneskull])
  • Test & Netlify updates (@​Munter, [@​boneskull])

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR is stale, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/mocha-5.x branch from c9b642d to ca25810 Compare December 8, 2018 11:46
@RYOSKATE RYOSKATE merged commit 332df9d into master Dec 9, 2018
@RYOSKATE RYOSKATE deleted the renovate/mocha-5.x branch December 9, 2018 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants