Bindeps again #105
Bindeps again #105
Conversation
|
If you restart the OSX jobs, you should see the same issue as in #104. |
1 similar comment
abelsiqueira
force-pushed
the
bindeps-again
branch
from
ac18f7a to
5022817
Compare
1 similar comment
| error("libgfortran.so not found. Did you install it?") | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it CUTEst.jl's job to search for libgfortran? It seems you're searching very standard locations. If it's in one of those, it should be on the library path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was trying to have the easiest way possible to install CUTEst.jl. BinDeps doesn't let me install using sudo, so we're gonna have to ask the user to install manually with apt-get, pacman or whatever he uses. But where is libgfortran.so after installation is another problem, because it varies with the distribution and even the Ubuntu version, so I was trying to just search for it, instead. I think /usr/local/lib might sometimes not be in the library path (might be distribution specific). usr/lib can probably be skipped though.
However, if you think this is too much, I can remove it, and this is probably the most we can do: install gsl-1.16 for the user.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems to me that installing gfortran in such a way that libgfortran can be found is gfortran's responsibility. I thought BinDeps let you declare pacman, apt-get, etc., dependencies. What good are they if you can't install them? I feel this is overkill and it's reasonable to ask the user to have gfortran.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
installing gfortran in such a way that libgfortran can be found is gfortran's responsibility
I don't know who to complain about it. Possibly apt mantainers?
I thought BinDeps let you declare pacman, apt-get, etc., dependencies
It should, but it is broken. See here.
abelsiqueira
force-pushed
the
bindeps-again
branch
from
b9a37de to
c42407c
Compare
abelsiqueira
force-pushed
the
bindeps-again
branch
2 times, most recently
from
23f9309 to
b34aa51
Compare
|
The only failures are on 0.6. The |
2 similar comments
abelsiqueira
force-pushed
the
bindeps-again
branch
from
6e86d17 to
e8fc94b
Compare
|
Rebased |
2 similar comments
|
Excellent, thank you! |
* Install gsl-1.16 with BinDeps * Don't need sudo anymore * Add BinDeps to REQUIRE * Add include path for gsl * Update travis to fix libgfortran.so location * Update docs to reflect changes in installation
|
|
||
| if is_apple() | ||
| if Pkg.installed("Homebrew") === nothing | ||
| error("Homebrew package not installed, please run Pkg.add(\"Homebrew\")") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is unnecessary and redundant with @osx Homebrew in the REQUIRE file - all the packages you see this in have cargo-cult copy pasted it despite it being incorrect
The latest build fails because of sudo (discourse,
JuliaPackaging/BinDeps.jl#199)), thwarting my plans of one-commands-install-all.
My current strategy is building
gsl-1.16using BinDeps, and requiring the user to installgfortranseparately.The next steps are to make sure that
libgfortranis visible, possibly insidedeps.