Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump cosmos-sdk and ibc in the v50 branch #1616

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

faddat
Copy link
Contributor

@faddat faddat commented Sep 11, 2023

This PR bumps cosmos-sdk in the sdk50 branch of wasmd so that ongoing development is easier.

It also gets rid of toolchain, fixing codeql.

@faddat faddat requested a review from alpe as a code owner September 11, 2023 05:12
@faddat faddat changed the title bump cosmos-sdk in the v50 branch bump cosmos-sdk and ibc in the v50 branch Sep 11, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you 🏄

@alpe alpe merged commit 5fa4442 into CosmWasm:sdk-upgrade050_rebased3 Sep 11, 2023
pinosu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
* Start implementation

* Add implementation + some e2e test

* Fix lint

* Squashed: sdk upgrade to v0.50

* rebuild protos with newer proto builder

(cherry picked from commit fd8f4c1)

* update ibc-go

(cherry picked from commit fb86679)

* bump cosmos-sdk and ibc in the v50 branch (#1616)

* tidy

* upgade ibc

* remove the toolchain command

* Bump sdk version

* Use correct bech32 prefix

* Bump SDK

* Enable fraud system test again

* Fix genesis param name

* Fix import/export simulations

* set log level for benchmarks

(cherry picked from commit 1cfb930)

* Apply review comments

* Remove gov beta1 helpers

* Bump sdk version to latest in branch

* Fix linter

* Setup mergify for main

* Update mergify for better branch name

---------

Co-authored-by: Pino' Surace <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Gadikian <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants