Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests #5065

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

vezenovm
Copy link
Contributor

@vezenovm vezenovm commented Mar 7, 2024

It isn't clear after some of the recursion cleanup in #4221 why double_verify_proof is failing the solidity verifier.

double_verify_proof was being used as a recursive proof itself to be verified inside of double_verify_nested_proof. I have renamed this test to double_verify_proof_recursive to note that its proof should be used as input to another circuit.

I have also included a new test double_verify_proof where we accept two non-nested proofs and use the Keccak prover. This is what we were previously expecting for double_verify_proof. I also brought back arretenberg-acir-tests-bb-sol for a few tests.

@vezenovm vezenovm requested review from TomAFrench and Maddiaa0 March 7, 2024 20:02
@@ -380,6 +380,18 @@ jobs:
command: cond_spot_run_build barretenberg-acir-tests-bb 32
aztec_manifest_key: barretenberg-acir-tests-bb

barretenberg-acir-tests-bb-sol:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ludamad I added this back to the CI. However, I only run a few tests (one basic test and the two recursive aggregation tests).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#5085

Needs to add this to the circle ci definition

@vezenovm vezenovm marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2024 20:03
@vezenovm vezenovm changed the title chore(ci): Add double_verify_proof_sol and enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests chore(ci): Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests Mar 7, 2024
@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from kevaundray March 7, 2024 20:16
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Mar 7, 2024

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

  • note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (8): 107 (+901%)
Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit 507c374b and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric 8 txs 32 txs 64 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes 5,700 18,884 36,452
l1_rollup_calldata_gas 66,276 239,396 469,856
l1_rollup_execution_gas 673,739 980,217 1,388,630
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms 1,189 4,541 (+1%) 8,970
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 197 (-3%) 542 985
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms ⚠️ 107 (+901%) 61.7 (+1%) 119 (+1%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms 12,070 (+1%) 47,895 (+1%) 95,679
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms 7,315 29,315 (+1%) 58,674 (-1%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms 4,726 (+1%) 18,507 (+1%) 36,886

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric 5 blocks 10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms 14,488 (-3%) 27,434 (+3%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 1,242 (+1%) 2,432 (+1%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 91.4 (+13%) 134 (-8%)
node_database_size_in_bytes 18,780,240 35,504,208
pxe_database_size_in_bytes 29,923 59,478

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit circuit_simulation_time_in_ms circuit_input_size_in_bytes circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init 252 44,736 28,001
private-kernel-ordering 195 52,625 14,627
base-rollup 658 (+1%) 177,932 997
root-rollup 68.8 4,320 825
private-kernel-inner 318 (-1%) 73,715 28,001
public-kernel-app-logic 164 34,920 27,972
public-kernel-tail 81.8 34,507 27,972
merge-rollup 8.50 (-9%) 2,840 997

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric 1 leaves 2 leaves 8 leaves 16 leaves 32 leaves 64 leaves 128 leaves 512 leaves 1024 leaves 2048 leaves 4096 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms 9.79 10.1 (-1%) 14.0 (-17%) 16.1 (-3%) 22.4 (+1%) 35.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count 16.9 17.5 23.0 31.6 47.0 79.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms 0.568 0.565 (-1%) 0.593 (-17%) 0.498 (-3%) 0.468 (+1%) 0.444 (+1%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45.8 (-2%) 72.1 (-5%) 231 443 (-1%) 885 (+2%) 1,733
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 96.0 159 543 1,055 2,079 4,127
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.470 (-2%) 0.445 (-5%) 0.423 0.415 (-1%) 0.420 (+1%) 0.416
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 53.7 107 (-4%) 340 659 1,320 (+1%) 2,653 (+2%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 104 207 691 1,363 2,707 5,395
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.478 0.482 (-4%) 0.462 (+1%) 0.454 0.459 (+1%) 0.461 (+1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 61.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count N/A N/A N/A N/A 109 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.535 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric 0 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes 19,179

Transaction processing duration by data writes.

Metric 0 new note hashes 1 new note hashes
tx_pxe_processing_time_ms 2,693 1,376
Metric 0 public data writes 1 public data writes
tx_sequencer_processing_time_ms 5.47 (-3%) 574

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
use dep::std;

#[recursive]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice find !

Stacked ontop of #5065. Adds the job to the system job graph.
@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from Maddiaa0 March 8, 2024 14:08
@vezenovm vezenovm enabled auto-merge (squash) March 8, 2024 14:33
@vezenovm vezenovm merged commit 58e1ff4 into master Mar 8, 2024
97 checks passed
@vezenovm vezenovm deleted the mv/acir-sol-tests-return branch March 8, 2024 15:07
AztecBot added a commit to noir-lang/noir that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
…tec-packages#5065)

It isn't clear after some of the recursion cleanup in
AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4221 why
`double_verify_proof` is failing the solidity verifier.

`double_verify_proof` was being used as a recursive proof itself to be
verified inside of `double_verify_nested_proof`. I have renamed this
test to `double_verify_proof_recursive` to note that its proof should be
used as input to another circuit.

I have also included a new test `double_verify_proof` where we accept
two non-nested proofs and use the Keccak prover. This is what we were
previously expecting for `double_verify_proof`. I also brought back
`arretenberg-acir-tests-bb-sol` for a few tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Maddiaa <[email protected]>
AztecBot added a commit to noir-lang/noir that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
…tec-packages#5065)

It isn't clear after some of the recursion cleanup in
AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4221 why
`double_verify_proof` is failing the solidity verifier.

`double_verify_proof` was being used as a recursive proof itself to be
verified inside of `double_verify_nested_proof`. I have renamed this
test to `double_verify_proof_recursive` to note that its proof should be
used as input to another circuit.

I have also included a new test `double_verify_proof` where we accept
two non-nested proofs and use the Keccak prover. This is what we were
previously expecting for `double_verify_proof`. I also brought back
`arretenberg-acir-tests-bb-sol` for a few tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Maddiaa <[email protected]>
PhilWindle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](#5059))
([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6))
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Basic public reverts
([#4870](#4870))
([5cccc78](5cccc78))
* Deploying new inbox
([#5036](#5036))
([fed729d](fed729d))
* Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash
([#5086](#5086))
([6206bec](6206bec))
* Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e
([#4983](#4983))
([480161f](480161f))
* IPA documentation
([#4924](#4924))
([48bd22e](48bd22e))
* Nullifier read requests in public kernel
([#4910](#4910))
([0e44247](0e44247))
* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](#5059))
([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](#4981))
([4b94d58](4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Canonical contract address
([#5030](#5030))
([b2af880](b2af880))
* Flaky deployment test
([#5035](#5035))
([039eafc](039eafc))
* Pull the correct platform image for noir
([#5097](#5097))
([3342371](3342371))
* Sleep function memory leak
([#5023](#5023))
([a72cfea](a72cfea)),
closes
[#4817](#4817)
* Storage v2
([#5027](#5027))
([fe3190e](fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](#5066))
([507c374](507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* Address warnings in noir test suite
([#4966](#4966))
([7ef4ef5](7ef4ef5))
* Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid
([#5034](#5034))
([df089de](df089de))
* Build avm transpiler if we are on mac
([#5039](#5039))
([c2966b9](c2966b9))
* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](#5065))
([58e1ff4](58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](#4959))
([f2fdefd](f2fdefd))
* Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo`
([#5044](#5044))
([add91ca](add91ca))
* Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI
([#5061](#5061))
([1be9243](1be9243))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](#4965))
([b9de0f5](b9de0f5))
* Moving RootRollupInputs impl
([#5087](#5087))
([f3d9f9b](f3d9f9b))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](#5084))
([77954ab](77954ab))


### Documentation

* Parity circuit naming fixes
([#5076](#5076))
([c255255](c255255))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* IPA documentation
([#4924](#4924))
([48bd22e](48bd22e))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](#4981))
([4b94d58](4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Storage v2
([#5027](#5027))
([fe3190e](fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](#5066))
([507c374](507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](#5065))
([58e1ff4](58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](#4959))
([f2fdefd](f2fdefd))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](#4965))
([b9de0f5](b9de0f5))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](#5084))
([77954ab](77954ab))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
AztecBot added a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Miscellaneous

* **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059))
([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6))
</details>

<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* Basic public reverts
([#4870](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4870))
([5cccc78](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5cccc78))
* Deploying new inbox
([#5036](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5036))
([fed729d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fed729d))
* Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash
([#5086](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5086))
([6206bec](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6206bec))
* Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e
([#4983](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4983))
([480161f](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@480161f))
* IPA documentation
([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924))
([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e))
* Nullifier read requests in public kernel
([#4910](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4910))
([0e44247](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e44247))
* Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract
([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059))
([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981))
([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Canonical contract address
([#5030](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5030))
([b2af880](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b2af880))
* Flaky deployment test
([#5035](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5035))
([039eafc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@039eafc))
* Pull the correct platform image for noir
([#5097](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5097))
([3342371](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3342371))
* Sleep function memory leak
([#5023](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5023))
([a72cfea](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a72cfea)),
closes
[#4817](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4817)
* Storage v2
([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027))
([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066))
([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* Address warnings in noir test suite
([#4966](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4966))
([7ef4ef5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7ef4ef5))
* Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid
([#5034](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5034))
([df089de](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@df089de))
* Build avm transpiler if we are on mac
([#5039](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5039))
([c2966b9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c2966b9))
* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065))
([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959))
([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd))
* Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo`
([#5044](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5044))
([add91ca](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@add91ca))
* Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI
([#5061](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5061))
([1be9243](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@1be9243))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965))
([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5))
* Moving RootRollupInputs impl
([#5087](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5087))
([f3d9f9b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f3d9f9b))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084))
([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab))


### Documentation

* Parity circuit naming fixes
([#5076](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5076))
([c255255](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c255255))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary>

##
[0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6)
(2024-03-08)


### Features

* IPA documentation
([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924))
([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e))
* Updating an SMT solver class
([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981))
([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58))


### Bug Fixes

* Storage v2
([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027))
([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e))
* Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies
([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066))
([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374))


### Miscellaneous

* **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests
([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065))
([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4))
* Cleanup of prover and verifier instances
([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959))
([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd))
* Join-split example Part 1
([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965))
([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5))
* Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops
are populated through function
([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084))
([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants