Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix React SSR hydration ID mismatch error #315

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 17, 2022
Merged

Conversation

yen-tt
Copy link
Contributor

@yen-tt yen-tt commented Oct 14, 2022

This PR is to fix the errors Warning: Prop "id" did not match. Server: "some-id". Client: "another-id", reported in https://yext.slack.com/archives/C032CKFARGS/p1664916209295449

React expects that the rendered content is identical between the server and the client. However, our usage of uuid means different id is generated from the HTML content generated through SSR vs the first render in client side during hydration process. This is a known issues in React SSR (issues in react repo[1][2][3]) and React released a new hook useId in React 18 to address it.

I found three potential solutions for React <18 to generate unique but predictable id, each with an external library we could use:

  1. Use context to keep a counter in state, so counter is not shared across renders. This approach is implemented in react-aria. When using SSR with React Aria, applications must be wrapped in an SSRProvider component to reset the count in server side to be zero for each fresh render. Multiple copies of React Aria is not supported so it would be a peer-dep
//in component lib (dropdown)
import { useId } from 'react-aria';
...
const screenReaderUUID: string = useId();

//in pageJS template using SSR
import { SSRProvider } from 'react-aria';
...
<SSRProvider>
    <TestComponent />
</SSRProvider>
  1. use a global counter to increment on initial renders and expose a reset function for SSR side. This approach is implemented in react-id-generator. There's a function resetId required to invoke from SSR side (such as in PageJS serverRenderRoute or somewhere in user's template page) to avoid mismatch during refresh, since browser generator will always restart from "1" but server's count will keep incrementing.

  2. Don't use IDs at all on the server; patch after first render. This approach is implemented in reach/auto-id. ID returned as undefined/empty on the first render so server and client have the same markup during hydration process. After render, patch the components with an incremented ID (second render) in useLayoutEffect. (more info here) No changes needed outside of using import { useId } from '@reach/auto-id'; in our component lib.

I decided to go with the last approach using react/auto-id because:

  • requires no additional work / changes from user side (only in component lib)
  • contain fallback implementation to React 18 useId if it's available
  • avoid potential concurrent rendering problem (such as suspense boundaries)
  • the main issue with this approach is that it causes a double render on any components with useId. However, since we (1) only update the ID attribute on DOM on second render, and (2) our components that uses useId already requires multiple renders to get setup, the performance is not greatly affected. I used Profiler in our test-site to measure performance, the number of renders and time spent for SearchBar, StaticFilters, and FilterSearch did not change as the dispatch from useId is grouped with other changes required in our components on second render. This is only needed for React <18

J=SLAP-2403
TEST=manual&auto

npm pack a build of the component lib with the new changes and tested SearchBar, FilterSearch, and StaticFilers:

See that the warning about Prop id mismatched no longer appear in console

added new jest test for Dropdown and StaticFilter, see that test failed the previous usage of uuid, and passed with reach/auto-id.

@yen-tt yen-tt requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2022 19:33
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2022

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 85.401% when pulling 34f950f on dev/fix-id-gen-ssr-issue into d8e76b9 on develop.

@yen-tt yen-tt force-pushed the dev/fix-id-gen-ssr-issue branch from a00fc0e to 8a2418b Compare October 17, 2022 15:21
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Current unit coverage is 88.49693251533742%
Current visual coverage is 77.40899357601712%
Current combined coverage is 89.03374233128834%

@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ module.exports = {
framework: '@storybook/react',
staticDirs: ['./public'],
webpackFinal: async (config) => {
//use commonjs entry point for "@reach" packages
config.resolve.alias['@reach/auto-id'] = require.resolve('@reach/auto-id');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out of curiosity why is this necessary?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yen-tt yen-tt Oct 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

our storybook uses commonjs and doesn't seem to handle mjs files.
Screen Shot 2022-10-17 at 12 59 15 PM

@reach/auto-id does export a commonjs version. But its package.json is set to "module": "./dist/reach-auto-id.mjs", and "main": "./dist/reach-auto-id.cjs.js",. I believe Webpack, used by Storybook, by default will try to use "module" over "main". Alternatively, we could also do config.resolve.mainFields = ['main', 'module']; but I thought the alias approach would be more specific.

render(<App />, { container, hydrate: true });
expect(consoleErrorSpy).not.toBeCalledWith(
expect.stringContaining('Warning: Prop `%s` did not match. Server: %s Client: %s%s'),
'id',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't need to use string concatenation for a hardcoded value

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yen-tt yen-tt Oct 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed expect.stringContaining, the rest of the arguments is needed in the order of the params received by console error.

Copy link
Contributor

@oshi97 oshi97 Oct 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think here it's react itself that's calling console.error . They probably use the same error call for all props which is why there's the string formatting bit there.
If react changes the implementation of their console.error call this test will stop functioning properly right? is there some other way to test this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yen-tt yen-tt Oct 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea, all prop mismatched error will use this message format. I suppose we don't need to explicitly check for id mismatched only, although I don't see other ways of testing this beside checking console error. I attempted to check for the html content of server vs client but it didn't work -- the actual of the container after hydration uses the same as server even though the error is present.
I decided to update the test to assert the number of error logged outside of the useLayoutEffect warning. This way, they may change their message format, the test will still fail as long as there is an error logged.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure that makes sense, I can't think of a better way to test this. If they switch to console.warn for example maybe we start getting false positives from the test, but we'd also notice console.warn's in the jest output (hopefully). If they remove the console messages then 🤷 but seems unlikely

@yen-tt yen-tt requested a review from oshi97 October 17, 2022 19:43
@yen-tt yen-tt merged commit 3b0ecbf into develop Oct 17, 2022
@yen-tt yen-tt deleted the dev/fix-id-gen-ssr-issue branch October 17, 2022 20:16
@tmeyer2115 tmeyer2115 mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2022
tmeyer2115 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2022
### Features
- Default behavior of `FilterSearch` was changed to better support Locators and Doctor Finders. Additionally, a new `onSelect` prop was added to the Component. The `searchOnSelect` prop is now deprecated.  (#323, #343, #333)
- A new CSS bundle without the Tailwind resets is exported. (#322)
- We've added a `MapboxMap` Component, powered by v2 of their JavaScript API. (#332)

### Changes
- Assorted updates to improve our GH Actions. 
- Styling of Facet Headers is now exposed in `FilterGroupCssClasses`. (#321)

### Bug Fixes
- Vulnerabilities were addressed for the repo and its test-site. 
- Fixed the Dropdown Component to invoke `preventDefault` only when it is active. (#307)
- Corrected a small error in the generation of SSR Hydration IDs. (#315)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants