-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated recording of asset names #40
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #40 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 2 2
Lines 236 239 +3
Branches 50 50
=====================================
+ Hits 236 239 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
karlvr
added a commit
to karlvr/webpack-manifest-plugin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2018
Second attempt. Based on webdeveric/webpack-assets-manifest#40 Resolves shellscape#167 mini-css-extract-plugin reports additional, incorrect information for files that are refenced in CSS. The first time we see the file the `module.userRequest` is correct, and we add to `moduleAssets` correctly. However mini-css-extract-plugin then also reports the same `file` but with `module.userRequest` set to the CSS file that references it, which caused us to overwrite the good value in `moduleAssets`. See the change in mini-css-extract-plugin that caused this webpack-contrib/mini-css-extract-plugin#177
karlvr
added a commit
to karlvr/webpack-manifest-plugin
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2020
Second attempt. Based on webdeveric/webpack-assets-manifest#40 Resolves shellscape#167 mini-css-extract-plugin reports additional, incorrect information for files that are refenced in CSS. The first time we see the file the `module.userRequest` is correct, and we add to `moduleAssets` correctly. However mini-css-extract-plugin then also reports the same `file` but with `module.userRequest` set to the CSS file that references it, which caused us to overwrite the good value in `moduleAssets`. See the change in mini-css-extract-plugin that caused this webpack-contrib/mini-css-extract-plugin#177
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #39