Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark 'Time Stamping' extended key usage extension as critical #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vlaci
Copy link

@vlaci vlaci commented Sep 26, 2017

As stated in section 2.3 of RFC3161:

The corresponding certificate MUST contain only one instance of the
extended key usage field extension as defined in [RFC2459] Section
4.2.1.13 with KeyPurposeID having value:

id-kp-timeStamping. This extension MUST be critical.

As stated in section 2.3 of RFC3161:
>   The corresponding certificate MUST contain only one instance of the
>   extended key usage field extension as defined in [RFC2459] Section
>   4.2.1.13 with KeyPurposeID having value:
>
>   id-kp-timeStamping.  This extension MUST be critical.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #6 into master will increase coverage by 1.78%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #6      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.77%   66.56%   +1.78%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         318      320       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          206      213       +7     
+ Misses        112      107       -5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
certbuilder/__init__.py 66.24% <100%> (+1.8%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8965d51...cd2b2bf. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant