Partially corrected CORS checks on the client side

[bioluks]

Hi, like explained here since version 3.2 the enable_cors option is under [chttpd] and not [httpd]. I only moved the enable_cors option. Result on my testing rig:

The cors.origins check still needs an addition, it works just fine when there are no spaces between the origins, on my setup I have them so that's the reason why I have this error; since both are valid in the local.ini configuration both can be accepted?

[bioluks]

Also a couchdb version check can be added; if it's lower than 3.2 [httpd].enable_cors would be the right path

[vrtmrz]

Sorry for my absence! and thank you for making this PR! I did not realise it yet!
This steady fixing would help us! However, as you pointed out, there might be users of v3.2 before.
Would you mind if I ask you to leave the previous check logic as a warning with a comment like (v3.1 or before)?
(i.e., ⚠ chttpd.enable_cors is wrong (v3.1 or before) ).

It would be harmless even if chttpd.enable_cors is configured after v3.2.

[bioluks]

No thing, thanks for this great project!

Would you mind if I ask you to leave the previous check logic as a warning with a comment like (v3.1 or before)?
(i.e., ⚠ chttpd.enable_cors is wrong (v3.1 or before) ).

We can do that, but wouldn't it be better if we do a server version check first? Visiting the server gives a JSON response like the following already:

So what I'm saying is if it's lower than 3.2 it should say httpd.enable_cors is ok and shouldn't print information about chttpd.enable_cors; but if it's 3.2 and higher it should say chttpd.enable_cors is ok without the unneccesary httpd.enable_cors part in this case. The https.enable_cors is wrong warning made me lose hope first time setting up couchdb. Short comments next to important errors are not working so well for the majority, my personal thought. What do you think?

[vrtmrz]

Yes, checking the remote version should be the correct way. As your mentioned, we should make an easy-usable fix than an easy fix.
Thank you for bringing me back to the attitude we should be.

Would you mind if I ask you to add that logic as well, please?

[bioluks]

Of course I can and I wanted to add it; before that I wanted to hear your opinion. Next week I'll have the free time to add this check and test it out thoroughly.

[cwsqer006]

DFGTYHKL;

[cwsqer006]

DFGHJKL/