Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add(isURL): added require_port option #1436

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020
Merged

Conversation

yshanli
Copy link
Contributor

@yshanli yshanli commented Sep 15, 2020

Add require_port option for isURL. Default require_port is false.

In my isURL test scenario, a port in URL is must, so I want to add a require_port option.

Checklist

  • README updated (where applicable)
  • Tests written (where applicable)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1436 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #1436   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           95        95           
  Lines         1254      1256    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          1254      1256    +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lib/isURL.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e3f9d2b...4979ece. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@profnandaa profnandaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contrib! 🎉

/cc. @tux-tn @ezkemboi

Copy link
Member

@tux-tn tux-tn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants