-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 806
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
epic: implement validators from validator.js #1747
Comments
Here's another feature PR that seems ready for review: |
Has the project been suspended? |
There has been no word from @NoNameProvided in a while, but we have heard from @jotamorais and @saulotoledo last month, who are members of Typestack. See #1719 |
thank you! |
Just to chime in, it's not a project goal to implement every single validator from validator.js, so please open an issue before adding an implementation. |
I think this issue has outlived its usefulness by now |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Description
The goal of this issue is to have an overview over presumably uncontroversial feature PRs that implement new validation decorators for validators from the upstream library validator.js
Proposed solution
Review and merge the open PRs that implement such validators
Ready for maintainer review
Need some work still
@IsPortNumber
decorator #1735List of new-ish features in validator.js that don't have a PR yet
(comment if you know any!)
I'll try to look through issues to see if I can spot some.
@jotamorais
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: