feat(eslint-plugin): update recommended configs

[MichaelDeBoey]

BREAKING CHANGE: recommended configs are changed

---

Part of #3738
Part of #3746

[typescript-eslint]

Thanks for the PR, @MichaelDeBoey!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

---

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

[nx-cloud]

Nx Cloud Report

CI ran the following commands for commit 60e1ca5. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch

Status	Command
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin-tslint
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin-tslint
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin-internal
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin-tslint
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin-tslint
	nx test @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
	nx run-many --target=typecheck --all --parallel
	nx test @typescript-eslint/parser
	nx test @typescript-eslint/experimental-utils
	nx test @typescript-eslint/parser
	nx test @typescript-eslint/scope-manager
	nx test @typescript-eslint/visitor-keys
	nx test @typescript-eslint/experimental-utils
	nx test @typescript-eslint/typescript-estree
	nx test @typescript-eslint/scope-manager
	nx run-many --target=build --all --parallel
	nx run-many --target=build --all --parallel

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[bradzacher]

Note that this doesn't fully resolve #3646 because there is a few default rule option change that we need to make to ban-types - remove the object type.

So if you want to do that here, that's great - or else we can do a separate PR.

Otherwise - need to remove that one thing which I messed up, and fix the CI - then this is good to go.

[MichaelDeBoey]

Note that this doesn't fully resolve #3646 because there is a few default rule option change that we need to make to ban-types - remove the object type.

@bradzacher I'll do that in a follow-up PR: #3818

[bradzacher]

thanks!