I meant no offense #346

githubwyf · 2016-10-27T07:23:12Z

OKay

This is one from the department of "maybe play lottery if you hit this, karma compensation might work". Or at least lockdep ftw! This reverts commit 565d194. It's not quite as low-risk as the commit message claims, because this grabs console_lock, which might be held when we allocate memory, which might never happen because the dma_fence_wait() is stuck waiting on our gpu reset: [ 136.763714] ====================================================== [ 136.763714] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 136.763715] 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 Tainted: G W [ 136.763716] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 136.763716] kworker/2:3/682 is trying to acquire lock: [ 136.763716] ffffffff8226f140 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763723] but task is already holding lock: [ 136.763724] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763726] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 136.763726] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 136.763727] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 136.763730] __dma_fence_might_wait+0x41/0xb0 [ 136.763732] dma_resv_lockdep+0x171/0x202 [ 136.763734] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763736] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763738] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763740] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763740] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763743] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 [ 136.763745] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x6e0 [ 136.763747] device_create_groups_vargs+0x52/0xf0 [ 136.763747] device_create+0x49/0x60 [ 136.763749] fb_console_init+0x25/0x145 [ 136.763750] fbmem_init+0xcc/0xe2 [ 136.763750] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763751] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763752] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763753] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763753] -> #0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763755] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763756] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763757] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763761] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763809] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763850] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.763851] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763852] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.763853] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.763854] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.763855] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763855] other info that might help us debug this: [ 136.763856] Chain exists of: console_lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map [ 136.763857] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 136.763857] CPU0 CPU1 [ 136.763857] ---- ---- [ 136.763857] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 136.763858] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(console_lock); [ 136.763859] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 136.763860] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/682: [ 136.763860] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763862] #1: ffffc90000cafe58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763863] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763865] #3: ffff8887ab621748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x5ab/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763914] stack backtrace: [ 136.763915] CPU: 2 PID: 682 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 [ 136.763916] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 136.763918] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 136.763919] Call Trace: [ 136.763922] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 136.763924] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 136.763926] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763927] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763932] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763933] ? mark_held_locks+0x2d/0x80 [ 136.763934] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 [ 136.763936] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763940] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763944] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763993] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.764036] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.764038] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.764040] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.764041] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.764042] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 136.764044] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.764045] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 136.764046] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

... I think it's time to stop this little exercise. The lockdep splat, for the record: [ 132.583381] ====================================================== [ 132.584091] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 132.584775] 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 Tainted: G W [ 132.585461] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 132.586184] kworker/2:3/865 is trying to acquire lock: [ 132.586857] ffffc90000677c70 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.587569] but task is already holding lock: [ 132.589044] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.589803] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 132.592009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 132.593507] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 132.595019] dma_fence_begin_signalling+0x50/0x60 [ 132.595767] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0xa1/0x180 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.596567] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1ea/0x250 [drm] [ 132.597420] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x55/0x190 [drm] [ 132.598178] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x24/0x40 [drm] [ 132.598948] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.599738] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.600539] fbcon_init+0x2e8/0x660 [ 132.601344] visual_init+0xce/0x130 [ 132.602156] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x2b0 [ 132.602970] do_take_over_console+0x115/0x180 [ 132.603763] do_fbcon_takeover+0x58/0xb0 [ 132.604564] register_framebuffer+0x1ee/0x300 [ 132.605369] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36e/0x520 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.606187] amdgpu_fbdev_init+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ 132.607032] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xe90/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.607862] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.608697] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.609511] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.610324] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.611130] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.611939] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.612766] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.613593] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.614419] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.615249] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.616071] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.616902] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.617731] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.618560] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.619391] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.620228] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.621064] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.621903] -> #1 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 132.623587] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xcc/0x10c0 [ 132.624448] ww_mutex_lock+0x43/0xb0 [ 132.625315] drm_modeset_lock+0x44/0x120 [drm] [ 132.626184] drmm_mode_config_init+0x2db/0x8b0 [drm] [ 132.627098] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xbd1/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.628007] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.628920] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.629804] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.630690] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.631583] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.632479] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.633379] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.634275] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.635170] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.636069] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.636974] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.637870] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.638765] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.639654] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.640522] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.641372] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.642203] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.643022] -> #0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 132.644643] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.645469] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.646274] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.647071] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.647902] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.648698] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.649498] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.650300] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.651084] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.651825] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.652594] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.653402] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.654139] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.654868] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 132.655598] other info that might help us debug this: [ 132.657739] Chain exists of: crtc_ww_class_acquire --> crtc_ww_class_mutex --> dma_fence_map [ 132.659877] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 132.661416] CPU0 CPU1 [ 132.662126] ---- ---- [ 132.662847] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.663574] lock(crtc_ww_class_mutex); [ 132.664319] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.665063] lock(crtc_ww_class_acquire); [ 132.665799] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 132.667965] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/865: [ 132.668701] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.669462] #1: ffffc90000677e58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.670242] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.671039] #3: ffff8887b84a1748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x59e/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.671902] stack backtrace: [ 132.673515] CPU: 2 PID: 865 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 [ 132.674347] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 132.675194] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 132.676046] Call Trace: [ 132.676897] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 132.677748] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 132.678604] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 132.679459] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.680311] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.681163] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.682021] ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 [ 132.682880] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40 [ 132.683737] ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0 [ 132.684601] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.685466] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.686335] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.687255] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.688152] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.689057] ? amdgpu_fence_process+0x4c/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.689963] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.690893] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.691818] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.692707] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.693597] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.694487] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.695373] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 132.696264] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.697154] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 132.698057] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

This is one from the department of "maybe play lottery if you hit this, karma compensation might work". Or at least lockdep ftw! This reverts commit 565d194. It's not quite as low-risk as the commit message claims, because this grabs console_lock, which might be held when we allocate memory, which might never happen because the dma_fence_wait() is stuck waiting on our gpu reset: [ 136.763714] ====================================================== [ 136.763714] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 136.763715] 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 Tainted: G W [ 136.763716] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 136.763716] kworker/2:3/682 is trying to acquire lock: [ 136.763716] ffffffff8226f140 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763723] but task is already holding lock: [ 136.763724] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763726] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 136.763726] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 136.763727] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 136.763730] __dma_fence_might_wait+0x41/0xb0 [ 136.763732] dma_resv_lockdep+0x171/0x202 [ 136.763734] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763736] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763738] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763740] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763740] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763743] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 [ 136.763745] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x6e0 [ 136.763747] device_create_groups_vargs+0x52/0xf0 [ 136.763747] device_create+0x49/0x60 [ 136.763749] fb_console_init+0x25/0x145 [ 136.763750] fbmem_init+0xcc/0xe2 [ 136.763750] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763751] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763752] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763753] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763753] -> #0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763755] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763756] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763757] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763761] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763809] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763850] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.763851] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763852] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.763853] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.763854] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.763855] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763855] other info that might help us debug this: [ 136.763856] Chain exists of: console_lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map [ 136.763857] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 136.763857] CPU0 CPU1 [ 136.763857] ---- ---- [ 136.763857] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 136.763858] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(console_lock); [ 136.763859] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 136.763860] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/682: [ 136.763860] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763862] #1: ffffc90000cafe58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763863] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763865] #3: ffff8887ab621748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x5ab/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763914] stack backtrace: [ 136.763915] CPU: 2 PID: 682 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 [ 136.763916] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 136.763918] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 136.763919] Call Trace: [ 136.763922] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 136.763924] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 136.763926] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763927] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763932] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763933] ? mark_held_locks+0x2d/0x80 [ 136.763934] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 [ 136.763936] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763940] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763944] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763993] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.764036] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.764038] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.764040] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.764041] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.764042] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 136.764044] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.764045] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 136.764046] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

... I think it's time to stop this little exercise. The lockdep splat, for the record: [ 132.583381] ====================================================== [ 132.584091] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 132.584775] 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 Tainted: G W [ 132.585461] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 132.586184] kworker/2:3/865 is trying to acquire lock: [ 132.586857] ffffc90000677c70 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.587569] but task is already holding lock: [ 132.589044] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.589803] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 132.592009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 132.593507] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 132.595019] dma_fence_begin_signalling+0x50/0x60 [ 132.595767] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0xa1/0x180 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.596567] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1ea/0x250 [drm] [ 132.597420] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x55/0x190 [drm] [ 132.598178] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x24/0x40 [drm] [ 132.598948] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.599738] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.600539] fbcon_init+0x2e8/0x660 [ 132.601344] visual_init+0xce/0x130 [ 132.602156] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x2b0 [ 132.602970] do_take_over_console+0x115/0x180 [ 132.603763] do_fbcon_takeover+0x58/0xb0 [ 132.604564] register_framebuffer+0x1ee/0x300 [ 132.605369] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36e/0x520 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.606187] amdgpu_fbdev_init+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ 132.607032] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xe90/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.607862] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.608697] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.609511] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.610324] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.611130] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.611939] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.612766] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.613593] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.614419] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.615249] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.616071] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.616902] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.617731] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.618560] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.619391] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.620228] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.621064] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.621903] -> #1 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 132.623587] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xcc/0x10c0 [ 132.624448] ww_mutex_lock+0x43/0xb0 [ 132.625315] drm_modeset_lock+0x44/0x120 [drm] [ 132.626184] drmm_mode_config_init+0x2db/0x8b0 [drm] [ 132.627098] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xbd1/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.628007] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.628920] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.629804] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.630690] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.631583] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.632479] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.633379] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.634275] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.635170] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.636069] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.636974] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.637870] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.638765] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.639654] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.640522] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.641372] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.642203] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.643022] -> #0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 132.644643] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.645469] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.646274] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.647071] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.647902] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.648698] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.649498] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.650300] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.651084] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.651825] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.652594] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.653402] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.654139] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.654868] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 132.655598] other info that might help us debug this: [ 132.657739] Chain exists of: crtc_ww_class_acquire --> crtc_ww_class_mutex --> dma_fence_map [ 132.659877] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 132.661416] CPU0 CPU1 [ 132.662126] ---- ---- [ 132.662847] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.663574] lock(crtc_ww_class_mutex); [ 132.664319] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.665063] lock(crtc_ww_class_acquire); [ 132.665799] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 132.667965] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/865: [ 132.668701] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.669462] #1: ffffc90000677e58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.670242] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.671039] #3: ffff8887b84a1748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x59e/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.671902] stack backtrace: [ 132.673515] CPU: 2 PID: 865 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ torvalds#346 [ 132.674347] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 132.675194] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 132.676046] Call Trace: [ 132.676897] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 132.677748] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 132.678604] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 132.679459] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.680311] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.681163] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.682021] ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 [ 132.682880] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40 [ 132.683737] ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0 [ 132.684601] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.685466] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.686335] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.687255] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.688152] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.689057] ? amdgpu_fence_process+0x4c/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.689963] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.690893] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.691818] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.692707] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.693597] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.694487] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.695373] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 132.696264] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.697154] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 132.698057] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

Internally, UBD treats each physical IO segment as a separate command to be submitted in the execution pipe. If the pipe returns a transient error after a few segments have already been written, UBD will tell the block layer to requeue the request, but there is no way to reclaim the segments already submitted. When a new attempt to dispatch the request is done, those segments already submitted will get duplicated, causing the WARN_ON below in the best case, and potentially data corruption. In my system, running a UML instance with 2GB of RAM and a 50M UBD disk, I can reproduce the WARN_ON by simply running mkfs.fvat against the disk on a freshly booted system. There are a few ways to around this, like reducing the pressure on the pipe by reducing the queue depth, which almost eliminates the occurrence of the problem, increasing the pipe buffer size on the host system, or by limiting the request to one physical segment, which causes the block layer to submit way more requests to resolve a single operation. Instead, this patch modifies the format of a UBD command, such that all segments are sent through a single element in the communication pipe, turning the command submission atomic from the point of view of the block layer. The new format has a variable size, depending on the number of elements, and looks like this: +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ | cmd_header | segment 0 | segment 1 | segment ... +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ With this format, we push a pointer to cmd_header in the submission pipe. This has the advantage of reducing the memory footprint of executing a single request, since it allow us to merge some fields in the header. It is possible to reduce even further each segment memory footprint, by merging bitmap_words and cow_offset, for instance, but this is not the focus of this patch and is left as future work. One issue with the patch is that for a big number of segments, we now perform one big memory allocation instead of multiple small ones, but I wasn't able to trigger any real issues or -ENOMEM because of this change, that wouldn't be reproduced otherwise. This was tested using fio with the verify-crc32 option, and by running an ext4 filesystem over this UBD device. The original WARN_ON was: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-00002-g2a5bb2cf75c8 torvalds#346 Stack: 6084eed0 6063dc77 00000009 6084ef60 00000000 604b8d9f 6084eee0 6063dcbc 6084ef40 6006ab8d e013d780 1c00000000 Call Trace: [<600a0c1c>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<6004a888>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155 [<6063dc77>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xdf/0xe8 [<604b8d9f>] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6063dcbc>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6006ab8d>] __warn+0x107/0x134 [<6008da6c>] ? wake_up_process+0x17/0x19 [<60487628>] ? blk_queue_max_discard_sectors+0x0/0xd [<6006b05f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd1/0xdf [<6006af8e>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xdf [<600acc14>] ? raw_read_seqcount_begin.constprop.0+0x0/0x15 [<600619ae>] ? os_nsecs+0x1d/0x2b [<604b8d9f>] refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6048bc8f>] refcount_sub_and_test.constprop.0+0x2f/0x37 [<6048c8de>] blk_mq_free_request+0xf1/0x10d [<6048ca06>] __blk_mq_end_request+0x10c/0x114 [<6005ac0f>] ubd_intr+0xb5/0x169 [<600a1a37>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6b/0x17e [<600a1b70>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x26/0x69 [<600a1bd9>] handle_irq_event+0x26/0x34 [<600a1bb3>] ? handle_irq_event+0x0/0x34 [<600a5186>] ? unmask_irq+0x0/0x37 [<600a57e6>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0xd6 [<600a131a>] generic_handle_irq+0x21/0x29 [<60048f6e>] do_IRQ+0x39/0x54 [...] ---[ end trace c6e7444e55386c0f ]--- Cc: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Reported-by: Martyn Welch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fc6b6a8 ] Internally, UBD treats each physical IO segment as a separate command to be submitted in the execution pipe. If the pipe returns a transient error after a few segments have already been written, UBD will tell the block layer to requeue the request, but there is no way to reclaim the segments already submitted. When a new attempt to dispatch the request is done, those segments already submitted will get duplicated, causing the WARN_ON below in the best case, and potentially data corruption. In my system, running a UML instance with 2GB of RAM and a 50M UBD disk, I can reproduce the WARN_ON by simply running mkfs.fvat against the disk on a freshly booted system. There are a few ways to around this, like reducing the pressure on the pipe by reducing the queue depth, which almost eliminates the occurrence of the problem, increasing the pipe buffer size on the host system, or by limiting the request to one physical segment, which causes the block layer to submit way more requests to resolve a single operation. Instead, this patch modifies the format of a UBD command, such that all segments are sent through a single element in the communication pipe, turning the command submission atomic from the point of view of the block layer. The new format has a variable size, depending on the number of elements, and looks like this: +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ | cmd_header | segment 0 | segment 1 | segment ... +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ With this format, we push a pointer to cmd_header in the submission pipe. This has the advantage of reducing the memory footprint of executing a single request, since it allow us to merge some fields in the header. It is possible to reduce even further each segment memory footprint, by merging bitmap_words and cow_offset, for instance, but this is not the focus of this patch and is left as future work. One issue with the patch is that for a big number of segments, we now perform one big memory allocation instead of multiple small ones, but I wasn't able to trigger any real issues or -ENOMEM because of this change, that wouldn't be reproduced otherwise. This was tested using fio with the verify-crc32 option, and by running an ext4 filesystem over this UBD device. The original WARN_ON was: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-00002-g2a5bb2cf75c8 Freescale#346 Stack: 6084eed0 6063dc77 00000009 6084ef60 00000000 604b8d9f 6084eee0 6063dcbc 6084ef40 6006ab8d e013d780 1c00000000 Call Trace: [<600a0c1c>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<6004a888>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155 [<6063dc77>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xdf/0xe8 [<604b8d9f>] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6063dcbc>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6006ab8d>] __warn+0x107/0x134 [<6008da6c>] ? wake_up_process+0x17/0x19 [<60487628>] ? blk_queue_max_discard_sectors+0x0/0xd [<6006b05f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd1/0xdf [<6006af8e>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xdf [<600acc14>] ? raw_read_seqcount_begin.constprop.0+0x0/0x15 [<600619ae>] ? os_nsecs+0x1d/0x2b [<604b8d9f>] refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6048bc8f>] refcount_sub_and_test.constprop.0+0x2f/0x37 [<6048c8de>] blk_mq_free_request+0xf1/0x10d [<6048ca06>] __blk_mq_end_request+0x10c/0x114 [<6005ac0f>] ubd_intr+0xb5/0x169 [<600a1a37>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6b/0x17e [<600a1b70>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x26/0x69 [<600a1bd9>] handle_irq_event+0x26/0x34 [<600a1bb3>] ? handle_irq_event+0x0/0x34 [<600a5186>] ? unmask_irq+0x0/0x37 [<600a57e6>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0xd6 [<600a131a>] generic_handle_irq+0x21/0x29 [<60048f6e>] do_IRQ+0x39/0x54 [...] ---[ end trace c6e7444e55386c0f ]--- Cc: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Reported-by: Martyn Welch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl warnings: WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#47: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:47: +typedef enum _BTC_POWERSAVE_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#54: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:54: +typedef enum _BTC_BT_REG_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#63: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:63: +typedef enum _BTC_CHIP_INTERFACE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#71: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:71: +typedef enum _BTC_CHIP_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#81: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:81: +typedef enum _BTC_MSG_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#167: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:167: +typedef struct _BTC_BOARD_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#177: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:177: +typedef enum _BTC_DBG_OPCODE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#187: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:187: +typedef enum _BTC_RSSI_STATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#200: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:200: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_ROLE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#208: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:208: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_BW_MODE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#215: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:215: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_TRAFFIC_DIR { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#221: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:221: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_PNP { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#228: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:228: +typedef enum _BT_WIFI_COEX_STATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#239: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:239: +typedef enum _BTC_GET_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#281: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:281: +typedef enum _BTC_SET_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#321: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:321: +typedef enum _BTC_DBG_DISP_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#328: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:328: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_IPS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#334: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:334: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_LPS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#340: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:340: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_SCAN { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#346: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:346: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_ASSOCIATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#352: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:352: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_MEDIA_STATUS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#358: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:358: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_SPECIAL_PACKET { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#366: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:366: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_STACK_OPERATION { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#374: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:374: +typedef enum _BTC_ANTENNA_POS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#412: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:412: +typedef struct _BTC_BT_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#440: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:440: +typedef struct _BTC_STACK_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#455: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:455: +typedef struct _BTC_BT_LINK_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#468: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:468: +typedef struct _BTC_STATISTICS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#487: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:487: +typedef struct _BTC_COEXIST { Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>

This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl warnings: WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#47: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:47: +typedef enum _BTC_POWERSAVE_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#54: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:54: +typedef enum _BTC_BT_REG_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#63: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:63: +typedef enum _BTC_CHIP_INTERFACE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#71: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:71: +typedef enum _BTC_CHIP_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#81: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:81: +typedef enum _BTC_MSG_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#167: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:167: +typedef struct _BTC_BOARD_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#177: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:177: +typedef enum _BTC_DBG_OPCODE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#187: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:187: +typedef enum _BTC_RSSI_STATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#200: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:200: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_ROLE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#208: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:208: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_BW_MODE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#215: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:215: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_TRAFFIC_DIR { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#221: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:221: +typedef enum _BTC_WIFI_PNP { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#228: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:228: +typedef enum _BT_WIFI_COEX_STATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#239: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:239: +typedef enum _BTC_GET_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#281: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:281: +typedef enum _BTC_SET_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#321: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:321: +typedef enum _BTC_DBG_DISP_TYPE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#328: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:328: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_IPS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#334: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:334: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_LPS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#340: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:340: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_SCAN { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#346: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:346: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_ASSOCIATE { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#352: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:352: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_MEDIA_STATUS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#358: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:358: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_SPECIAL_PACKET { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#366: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:366: +typedef enum _BTC_NOTIFY_TYPE_STACK_OPERATION { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#374: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:374: +typedef enum _BTC_ANTENNA_POS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#412: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:412: +typedef struct _BTC_BT_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#440: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:440: +typedef struct _BTC_STACK_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#455: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:455: +typedef struct _BTC_BT_LINK_INFO { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#468: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:468: +typedef struct _BTC_STATISTICS { WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#487: FILE: hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:487: +typedef struct _BTC_COEXIST { Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

rust/kernel: remove config `#ifdef` in Error.rs file

Internally, UBD treats each physical IO segment as a separate command to be submitted in the execution pipe. If the pipe returns a transient error after a few segments have already been written, UBD will tell the block layer to requeue the request, but there is no way to reclaim the segments already submitted. When a new attempt to dispatch the request is done, those segments already submitted will get duplicated, causing the WARN_ON below in the best case, and potentially data corruption. In my system, running a UML instance with 2GB of RAM and a 50M UBD disk, I can reproduce the WARN_ON by simply running mkfs.fvat against the disk on a freshly booted system. There are a few ways to around this, like reducing the pressure on the pipe by reducing the queue depth, which almost eliminates the occurrence of the problem, increasing the pipe buffer size on the host system, or by limiting the request to one physical segment, which causes the block layer to submit way more requests to resolve a single operation. Instead, this patch modifies the format of a UBD command, such that all segments are sent through a single element in the communication pipe, turning the command submission atomic from the point of view of the block layer. The new format has a variable size, depending on the number of elements, and looks like this: +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ | cmd_header | segment 0 | segment 1 | segment ... +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ With this format, we push a pointer to cmd_header in the submission pipe. This has the advantage of reducing the memory footprint of executing a single request, since it allow us to merge some fields in the header. It is possible to reduce even further each segment memory footprint, by merging bitmap_words and cow_offset, for instance, but this is not the focus of this patch and is left as future work. One issue with the patch is that for a big number of segments, we now perform one big memory allocation instead of multiple small ones, but I wasn't able to trigger any real issues or -ENOMEM because of this change, that wouldn't be reproduced otherwise. This was tested using fio with the verify-crc32 option, and by running an ext4 filesystem over this UBD device. The original WARN_ON was: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-00002-g2a5bb2cf75c8 torvalds#346 Stack: 6084eed0 6063dc77 00000009 6084ef60 00000000 604b8d9f 6084eee0 6063dcbc 6084ef40 6006ab8d e013d780 1c00000000 Call Trace: [<600a0c1c>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<6004a888>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155 [<6063dc77>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xdf/0xe8 [<604b8d9f>] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6063dcbc>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6006ab8d>] __warn+0x107/0x134 [<6008da6c>] ? wake_up_process+0x17/0x19 [<60487628>] ? blk_queue_max_discard_sectors+0x0/0xd [<6006b05f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd1/0xdf [<6006af8e>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xdf [<600acc14>] ? raw_read_seqcount_begin.constprop.0+0x0/0x15 [<600619ae>] ? os_nsecs+0x1d/0x2b [<604b8d9f>] refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6048bc8f>] refcount_sub_and_test.constprop.0+0x2f/0x37 [<6048c8de>] blk_mq_free_request+0xf1/0x10d [<6048ca06>] __blk_mq_end_request+0x10c/0x114 [<6005ac0f>] ubd_intr+0xb5/0x169 [<600a1a37>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6b/0x17e [<600a1b70>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x26/0x69 [<600a1bd9>] handle_irq_event+0x26/0x34 [<600a1bb3>] ? handle_irq_event+0x0/0x34 [<600a5186>] ? unmask_irq+0x0/0x37 [<600a57e6>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0xd6 [<600a131a>] generic_handle_irq+0x21/0x29 [<60048f6e>] do_IRQ+0x39/0x54 [...] ---[ end trace c6e7444e55386c0f ]--- Bug: 176213565 Cc: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Reported-by: Martyn Welch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit fc6b6a8) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Change-Id: I5772030c5864103892cfb5e63b13650ddda5ccad

[ Upstream commit fc6b6a8 ] Internally, UBD treats each physical IO segment as a separate command to be submitted in the execution pipe. If the pipe returns a transient error after a few segments have already been written, UBD will tell the block layer to requeue the request, but there is no way to reclaim the segments already submitted. When a new attempt to dispatch the request is done, those segments already submitted will get duplicated, causing the WARN_ON below in the best case, and potentially data corruption. In my system, running a UML instance with 2GB of RAM and a 50M UBD disk, I can reproduce the WARN_ON by simply running mkfs.fvat against the disk on a freshly booted system. There are a few ways to around this, like reducing the pressure on the pipe by reducing the queue depth, which almost eliminates the occurrence of the problem, increasing the pipe buffer size on the host system, or by limiting the request to one physical segment, which causes the block layer to submit way more requests to resolve a single operation. Instead, this patch modifies the format of a UBD command, such that all segments are sent through a single element in the communication pipe, turning the command submission atomic from the point of view of the block layer. The new format has a variable size, depending on the number of elements, and looks like this: +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ | cmd_header | segment 0 | segment 1 | segment ... +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ With this format, we push a pointer to cmd_header in the submission pipe. This has the advantage of reducing the memory footprint of executing a single request, since it allow us to merge some fields in the header. It is possible to reduce even further each segment memory footprint, by merging bitmap_words and cow_offset, for instance, but this is not the focus of this patch and is left as future work. One issue with the patch is that for a big number of segments, we now perform one big memory allocation instead of multiple small ones, but I wasn't able to trigger any real issues or -ENOMEM because of this change, that wouldn't be reproduced otherwise. This was tested using fio with the verify-crc32 option, and by running an ext4 filesystem over this UBD device. The original WARN_ON was: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-00002-g2a5bb2cf75c8 torvalds#346 Stack: 6084eed0 6063dc77 00000009 6084ef60 00000000 604b8d9f 6084eee0 6063dcbc 6084ef40 6006ab8d e013d780 1c00000000 Call Trace: [<600a0c1c>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<6004a888>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155 [<6063dc77>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xdf/0xe8 [<604b8d9f>] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6063dcbc>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6006ab8d>] __warn+0x107/0x134 [<6008da6c>] ? wake_up_process+0x17/0x19 [<60487628>] ? blk_queue_max_discard_sectors+0x0/0xd [<6006b05f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd1/0xdf [<6006af8e>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xdf [<600acc14>] ? raw_read_seqcount_begin.constprop.0+0x0/0x15 [<600619ae>] ? os_nsecs+0x1d/0x2b [<604b8d9f>] refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6048bc8f>] refcount_sub_and_test.constprop.0+0x2f/0x37 [<6048c8de>] blk_mq_free_request+0xf1/0x10d [<6048ca06>] __blk_mq_end_request+0x10c/0x114 [<6005ac0f>] ubd_intr+0xb5/0x169 [<600a1a37>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6b/0x17e [<600a1b70>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x26/0x69 [<600a1bd9>] handle_irq_event+0x26/0x34 [<600a1bb3>] ? handle_irq_event+0x0/0x34 [<600a5186>] ? unmask_irq+0x0/0x37 [<600a57e6>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0xd6 [<600a131a>] generic_handle_irq+0x21/0x29 [<60048f6e>] do_IRQ+0x39/0x54 [...] ---[ end trace c6e7444e55386c0f ]--- Cc: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Reported-by: Martyn Welch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <[email protected]> Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

ANBZ: #1742 ANBZ: torvalds#346 This patch introduces link-related proc files to report statistics information of SMC-R links. Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]> Link: https://gitee.com/anolis/cloud-kernel/pulls/577 Link: https://gitee.com/anolis/cloud-kernel/pulls/906

@2

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

# ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t netkit [...] ./test_progs -t netkit [ 1.140780] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.141127] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.284601] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3408.006 MHz [ 1.286672] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd9b189d, max_idle_ns: 440795225691 ns [ 1.290384] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc torvalds#345 tc_netkit_basic:OK torvalds#346 tc_netkit_device:OK torvalds#347 tc_netkit_multi_links:OK torvalds#348 tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK torvalds#349 tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK torvalds#350 tc_netkit_pkt_type:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>

Add a test case to assert that the skb->pkt_type which was set from the BPF program is retained from the netkit xmit side to the peer's device at tcx ingress location. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t netkit [...] ./test_progs -t netkit [ 1.140780] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.141127] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.284601] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3408.006 MHz [ 1.286672] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd9b189d, max_idle_ns: 440795225691 ns [ 1.290384] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc torvalds#345 tc_netkit_basic:OK torvalds#346 tc_netkit_device:OK torvalds#347 tc_netkit_multi_links:OK torvalds#348 tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK torvalds#349 tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK torvalds#350 tc_netkit_pkt_type:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>

Add a test case to assert that the skb->pkt_type which was set from the BPF program is retained from the netkit xmit side to the peer's device at tcx ingress location. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t netkit [...] ./test_progs -t netkit [ 1.140780] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.141127] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.284601] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3408.006 MHz [ 1.286672] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd9b189d, max_idle_ns: 440795225691 ns [ 1.290384] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc torvalds#345 tc_netkit_basic:OK torvalds#346 tc_netkit_device:OK torvalds#347 tc_netkit_multi_links:OK torvalds#348 tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK torvalds#349 tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK torvalds#350 tc_netkit_pkt_type:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Add a test case to assert that the skb->pkt_type which was set from the BPF program is retained from the netkit xmit side to the peer's device at tcx ingress location. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t netkit [...] ./test_progs -t netkit [ 1.140780] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.141127] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.284601] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3408.006 MHz [ 1.286672] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd9b189d, max_idle_ns: 440795225691 ns [ 1.290384] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc torvalds#345 tc_netkit_basic:OK torvalds#346 tc_netkit_device:OK torvalds#347 tc_netkit_multi_links:OK torvalds#348 tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK torvalds#349 tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK torvalds#350 tc_netkit_pkt_type:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

githubwyf added 4 commits October 26, 2016 16:01

Try something new

afa00fc

Update README

a22eb21

Update README

bbf6997

Update aloop.c

6d325b0

githubwyf closed this Oct 27, 2016

TheSven73 pushed a commit to TheSven73/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2021

Merge pull request torvalds#346 from TheSven73/rust-for-linux-no-ifdefs

f9dc4fc

rust/kernel: remove config `#ifdef` in Error.rs file

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

I meant no offense #346

I meant no offense #346

githubwyf commented Oct 27, 2016

I meant no offense #346

I meant no offense #346

Conversation

githubwyf commented Oct 27, 2016