Use suffixed index names by default to prevent alias creation conflicts #973
+93
−19
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Synopsis
Recently, we encountered a problem during index reset operations where a race condition could cause an alias creation failure. The issue arises when:
users
) is being reset.users_<timestamp-suffix>
) and starts the import process.users
) pointing to the new suffixed index (here).users
index. This results in a conflict when trying to create the alias, as both an index and an alias cannot share the same name.Solution
To prevent this issue, I updated the index creation logic to always use suffixed index names and unsuffixed aliases by default, not just after an index reset. This ensures that the alias conflict issue caused by the recreation of the old unsuffixed index is avoided.
Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:
[Fix #issue-number]
(if the related issue exists).master
(if not - rebase it).