Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: update variant - recreate node pools on max_pods_per_node or pod_range change #1464

Conversation

splichy
Copy link
Contributor

@splichy splichy commented Nov 16, 2022

Adding missing keepers to allow max_pods_per_node or pod_range changes in update-variant

@splichy splichy requested review from a team, Jberlinsky and bharathkkb as code owners November 16, 2022 12:32
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Nov 16, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@comment-bot-dev
Copy link

@splichy
Thanks for the PR! 🚀
✅ Lint checks have passed.

Copy link
Member

@bharathkkb bharathkkb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @splichy

@bharathkkb bharathkkb merged commit b006593 into terraform-google-modules:master Nov 17, 2022
CPL-markus pushed a commit to WALTER-GROUP/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
…od_range change (terraform-google-modules#1464)

* fix: add missing max_pods_per_node & pod_range keepers for update variant module

* max_pods_per_node & pod_range keepers autogen
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants