Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix EL Container Arguments in Reconciler #838

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020
Merged

Fix EL Container Arguments in Reconciler #838

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

khrm
Copy link
Contributor

@khrm khrm commented Nov 23, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Change the way arguments are given to corev1.Container so that
there's no ambiguity while running EL.

Changes

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Release Notes

@khrm
Fix EL Container Arguments in Reconciler
a63f28d 
Change the way arguments are given to corev1.Container so that
there's no ambiguity while running EL.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Nov 23, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 23, 2020
@khrm
Set Default of IsMultiNS to false in EL reconciler
6dbd67d 
Setting Default of IsMultiNS to false instead of true. IsMultiNS is
set to true only when we get Selectors
@tekton-robot
Copy link

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-triggers-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/v1alpha1/eventlistener/eventlistener.go 79.4% 78.9% -0.4

@khrm khrm added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Nov 23, 2020
@savitaashture
Copy link
Contributor

@khrm with this it fixes issue with --is-multi-ns but still we get permission issue

E1123 08:17:43.821688       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope
E1123 08:17:47.527568       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope
E1123 08:17:54.554289       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope

@savitaashture
Copy link
Contributor

@khrm with this it fixes issue with --is-multi-ns but still we get permission issue

E1123 08:17:43.821688       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope
E1123 08:17:47.527568       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope
E1123 08:17:54.554289       1 reflector.go:178] k8s.io/[email protected]+incompatible/tools/cache/reflector.go:125: Failed to list *v1alpha1.ClusterTriggerBinding: clustertriggerbindings.triggers.tekton.dev is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:tlstest:tekton-triggers-tls-sa" cannot list resource "clustertriggerbindings" in API group "triggers.tekton.dev" at the cluster scope

Ok i got above issue because i was running examples in different namespace

@savitaashture
Copy link
Contributor

PR looks good to me i have verified by testing on minikube

Thanks @khrm

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 23, 2020
@savitaashture savitaashture mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2020
Closed
4 tasks
@khrm khrm requested review from wlynch and dibyom November 23, 2020 13:50
dibyom
dibyom approved these changes Nov 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! This looks good!

@tekton-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 23, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 5a08634 into tektoncd:master Nov 23, 2020
@khrm khrm deleted the b/ContainerArg branch July 28, 2021 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dibyom dibyom dibyom approved these changes

@ncskier ncskier Awaiting requested review from ncskier

@vtereso vtereso Awaiting requested review from vtereso

@wlynch wlynch Awaiting requested review from wlynch

Assignees

@savitaashture savitaashture

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@khrm @tekton-robot @savitaashture @dibyom