Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolving cache sync issues #1037

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jmcshane
Copy link
Contributor

@jmcshane jmcshane commented Apr 9, 2021

Changes

The factory stops syncing based on the context that is passed into the Start
function. We should wait for the cache sync with the short timeout, but the
factory should run for the lifetime of the eventlistener, hence the root
context object, with ctx.Done(), as it was before #1013

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

Release Notes

Bugfix: Resolve cache sync issues introduced in v0.12.1

Closes #1026
Closes #1036

The factory stops syncing based on the context tthat is passed into the Start
function. We should wait for the cache sync with the short timeout, but the
factory should run for the lifetime of the eventlistener, hence the root
context object, with ctx.Done(), as it was before tektoncd#1013
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Apr 9, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from dibyom and iancoffey April 9, 2021 16:30
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 9, 2021
@jmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmcshane commented Apr 9, 2021

See #1026 for a test case that you can use to reproduce the issue and demonstrate that it is fixed

@jmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmcshane commented Apr 9, 2021

/assign @ncskier

@savitaashture
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @jmcshane Thanks for the quick fix 👍

I have verified locally on minikube and its working as expected

@tekton-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: savitaashture

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 9, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@savitaashture savitaashture left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 9, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit e8f8565 into tektoncd:main Apr 9, 2021
@jmcshane jmcshane deleted the bugfix/cache-sync branch April 9, 2021 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
4 participants