-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding log sanitization #124
Conversation
WalkthroughRecent modifications in the codebase focus on enhancing the security and readability of log statements in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant Logger
participant Sanitize
Client->>Server: HTTP Request with URL
Server->>Sanitize: sanitize.String(URL.EscapedPath())
Sanitize-->>Server: Cleaned URL Path
Server->>Logger: Log "HTTP Request to [Sanitized URL] received"
Server-->>Client: Handle Request
Server->>Sanitize: sanitize.String(URL.EscapedPath())
Sanitize-->>Server: Cleaned URL Path
Server->>Logger: Log "HTTP Request to [Sanitized URL] complete"
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- pkg/app/server.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/sanitize/sanitize_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go
[warning] 11-12: pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go#L11-L12
Added lines #L11 - L12 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (3)
pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go (1)
11-12
: Ensure test coverage for theString
function.The implementation is not covered by tests, as indicated by the static analysis tool.
Verification successful
The
String
function is covered by tests.The
String
function is tested in thepkg/sanitize/sanitize_test.go
file.
pkg/sanitize/sanitize_test.go
: Contains tests for theString
function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `String` function is tested. # Test: Search for tests for the `String` function. Expect: Occurrences in test files. rg --type go 'String('Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `String` function is tested. # Test: Search for tests for the `String` function. Expect: Occurrences in test files. rg --type go 'String\(' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 1130
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 11-12: pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go#L11-L12
Added lines #L11 - L12 were not covered by testspkg/app/server.go (2)
54-54
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
sanitize.String
are correct.Verification successful
Verification successful and no issues found.
The
sanitize.String
function is used correctly in the logging statements.
pkg/app/server.go:54
pkg/app/server.go:56
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sanitize.String` are correct. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct usage. rg --type go 'sanitize.String('Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sanitize.String` are correct. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct usage. rg --type go 'sanitize\.String\('Length of output: 233
80-80
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
sanitize.String
are correct.Verification successful
Function usage of
sanitize.String
is correct.
- Both occurrences found in
pkg/app/server.go
are consistent and used correctly inDebugf
statements.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sanitize.String` are correct. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct usage. rg --type go 'sanitize.String('Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sanitize.String` are correct. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct usage. rg --type go 'sanitize\.String\('Length of output: 233
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #124 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.08% 80.10% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 13 14 +1
Lines 1461 1463 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 1170 1172 +2
Misses 229 229
Partials 62 62 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go
[warning] 11-12: pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go#L11-L12
Added lines #L11 - L12 were not covered by tests
func String(s string) string { | ||
return strings.ReplaceAll(strings.ReplaceAll(s, "\r", ""), "\n", "") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add tests for the new functionality.
The new functionality that removes newline and carriage return characters should be covered by tests.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 11-12: pkg/sanitize/sanitize.go#L11-L12
Added lines #L11 - L12 were not covered by tests
Addressing log sanitization security warnings
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features