Fix ctx implicits under case unapplySeq #21748
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A case class with a varargs has a unapplySeq extractor instead of
unapply. When we type an unapply, in typedUnapply, we first look for
unapply methods before unapplySeq methods. But when searching for
unapply, if a class method isn't found, then an extension method is
looked for, which causes context implicits to be cached. The bindings
from a pattern (such as from an unapply or unapplySeq extractor) are
added to the scope in indexPattern. But Context's
implicitCache
doesn't account for the scope changing.
I opted for giving the body its own scope context, rather than making
indexPattern reset the context implicits cache.
Fixes #21742