Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation of implicit conversions #20103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rjolly
Copy link
Contributor

@rjolly rjolly commented Apr 5, 2024

No description provided.

@rjolly rjolly force-pushed the method branch 3 times, most recently from aae29f1 to 2fd61f8 Compare April 5, 2024 14:27
@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

This is from the same discussion. #20091

@rjolly
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjolly commented Apr 5, 2024

oh sorry, you were faster than me.

@rjolly
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjolly commented Apr 5, 2024

@som-snytt notice my change to the implicit scope specification as well, if you feel it is relevant maybe you could take it in your PR and I will close this one, please tell me.

@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

I will wait upon @sjrd feedback.

@sjrd sjrd self-assigned this Apr 6, 2024
@sjrd sjrd merged commit 2e956f8 into scala:main Apr 8, 2024
19 checks passed
@rjolly
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjolly commented May 1, 2024

@sjrd I think this needs to be merged in language-reference-stable to be visible on the website.

@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.5.0 milestone May 10, 2024
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Backports #20103 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants