-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #96073
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #96073
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
All other ABIs are left unstable for now. cc rust-lang#64926
I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
…pnkfelix Only add codegen backend to dep info if -Zbinary-dep-depinfo is used I am currently migrating the cg_clif build system from using a binary linked to the codegen backend as rustc replacement to passing `-Zcodegen-backend` instead. Without this PR this would force cargo to rebuild the sysroot on any change to the codegen backend even if I explicitly specify that I want it to be preserved, which would make development of cg_clif a lot slower. If you still want to have changes to the codegen backend invalidate the cargo build cache you can explicitly specify `-Zbinary-dep-depinfo`. cc ``@eddyb`` as the codegen backend was initially added to the depinfo for rust-gpu.
…um, r=davidtwco Stabilize `derive_default_enum` This stabilizes `#![feature(derive_default_enum)]`, as proposed in [RFC 3107](rust-lang/rfcs#3107) and tracked in rust-lang#87517. In short, it permits you to `#[derive(Default)]` on `enum`s, indicating what the default should be by placing a `#[default]` attribute on the desired variant (which must be a unit variant in the interest of forward compatibility). ``````@rustbot`````` label +S-waiting-on-review +T-lang
Create (unstable) 2024 edition [On Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Deprecating.20macro.20scoping.20shenanigans/near/272860652), there was a small aside regarding creating the 2024 edition now as opposed to later. There was a reasonable amount of support and no stated opposition. This change creates the 2024 edition in the compiler and creates a prelude for the 2024 edition. There is no current difference between the 2021 and 2024 editions. Cargo and other tools will need to be updated separately, as it's not in the same repository. This change permits the vast majority of work towards the next edition to proceed _now_ instead of waiting until 2024. For sanity purposes, I've merged the "hello" UI tests into a single file with multiple revisions. Otherwise we'd end up with a file per edition, despite them being essentially identical. ```@rustbot``` label +T-lang +S-waiting-on-review Not sure on the relevant team, to be honest.
Check var scope if it exist Fixes rust-lang#92893. Added helper function to check the scope of a variable, if it doesn't have a scope call delay_span_bug, which avoids us trying to get a block/scope that doesn't exist. Had to increase `ROOT_ENTRY_LIMIT` was getting tidy error
Parse inner attributes on inline const block According to rust-lang#84414 (comment), inner attributes are intended to be supported *"in all containers for statements (or some subset of statements)"*. This PR adds inner attribute parsing and pretty-printing for inline const blocks (rust-lang#76001), which contain statements just like an unsafe block or a loop body. ```rust let _ = const { #![allow(...)] let x = (); x }; ```
… r=pnkfelix Stablize `const_extern_fn` for "Rust" and "C" All other ABIs are left unstable for now. cc rust-lang#64926
only downgrade selection Error -> Ambiguous if type error is in predicate That is, we don't care if there's a TypeError type in the ParamEnv. Fixes rust-lang#95408
…Simulacrum Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std` I managed to break this in rust-lang#95449. I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0` and is strictly closer to the previous behavior. Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot: ``` error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on --> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5 | 14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol}; | ^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled? = note: the following crate versions were found: crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib ```
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Apr 15, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit ced4156 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 15, 2022
⌛ Testing commit ced4156 with merge 4a9b33f672e1cdb57c187b865a3286c00d11f51b... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 15, 2022
Caused by #95759 |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
derive_default_enum
#94457 (Stabilizederive_default_enum
)const_extern_fn
for "Rust" and "C" #95346 (Stablizeconst_extern_fn
for "Rust" and "C")x test --doc --stage 0 library/std
#95993 (Fixx test --doc --stage 0 library/std
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup