-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initiate the inner usage of let_chains
#94376
Merged
+88
−101
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ use rustc_target::abi::Abi; | |
use rustc_target::abi::{Integer, TagEncoding, Variants}; | ||
use rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi as SpecAbi; | ||
|
||
use if_chain::if_chain; | ||
use std::cmp; | ||
use std::iter; | ||
use std::ops::ControlFlow; | ||
|
@@ -1456,21 +1455,18 @@ impl InvalidAtomicOrdering { | |
sym::AtomicI64, | ||
sym::AtomicI128, | ||
]; | ||
if_chain! { | ||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(ref method_path, args, _) = &expr.kind; | ||
if recognized_names.contains(&method_path.ident.name); | ||
if let Some(m_def_id) = cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def_id(expr.hir_id); | ||
if let Some(impl_did) = cx.tcx.impl_of_method(m_def_id); | ||
if let Some(adt) = cx.tcx.type_of(impl_did).ty_adt_def(); | ||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(ref method_path, args, _) = &expr.kind | ||
&& recognized_names.contains(&method_path.ident.name) | ||
&& let Some(m_def_id) = cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def_id(expr.hir_id) | ||
&& let Some(impl_did) = cx.tcx.impl_of_method(m_def_id) | ||
&& let Some(adt) = cx.tcx.type_of(impl_did).ty_adt_def() | ||
// skip extension traits, only lint functions from the standard library | ||
if cx.tcx.trait_id_of_impl(impl_did).is_none(); | ||
|
||
if let Some(parent) = cx.tcx.parent(adt.did); | ||
if cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::atomic_mod, parent); | ||
if ATOMIC_TYPES.contains(&cx.tcx.item_name(adt.did)); | ||
then { | ||
return Some((method_path.ident.name, args)); | ||
} | ||
&& cx.tcx.trait_id_of_impl(impl_did).is_none() | ||
&& let Some(parent) = cx.tcx.parent(adt.did) | ||
&& cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::atomic_mod, parent) | ||
&& ATOMIC_TYPES.contains(&cx.tcx.item_name(adt.did)) | ||
{ | ||
return Some((method_path.ident.name, args)); | ||
} | ||
None | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -1499,111 +1495,103 @@ impl InvalidAtomicOrdering { | |
fn check_atomic_load_store(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) { | ||
use rustc_hir::def::{DefKind, Res}; | ||
use rustc_hir::QPath; | ||
if_chain! { | ||
if let Some((method, args)) = Self::inherent_atomic_method_call(cx, expr, &[sym::load, sym::store]); | ||
if let Some((ordering_arg, invalid_ordering)) = match method { | ||
if let Some((method, args)) = Self::inherent_atomic_method_call(cx, expr, &[sym::load, sym::store]) | ||
&& let Some((ordering_arg, invalid_ordering)) = match method { | ||
sym::load => Some((&args[1], sym::Release)), | ||
sym::store => Some((&args[2], sym::Acquire)), | ||
_ => None, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path)) = ordering_arg.kind; | ||
if let Res::Def(DefKind::Ctor(..), ctor_id) = path.res; | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, ctor_id, &[invalid_ordering, sym::AcqRel]); | ||
then { | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, ordering_arg.span, |diag| { | ||
if method == sym::load { | ||
diag.build("atomic loads cannot have `Release` or `AcqRel` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Acquire`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`") | ||
.emit() | ||
} else { | ||
debug_assert_eq!(method, sym::store); | ||
diag.build("atomic stores cannot have `Acquire` or `AcqRel` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Release`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`") | ||
.emit(); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
&& let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path)) = ordering_arg.kind | ||
&& let Res::Def(DefKind::Ctor(..), ctor_id) = path.res | ||
&& Self::matches_ordering(cx, ctor_id, &[invalid_ordering, sym::AcqRel]) | ||
Comment on lines
+1498
to
+1506
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Diff is scary but no logic was changed. In fact, everything was simply a matter of renaming |
||
{ | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, ordering_arg.span, |diag| { | ||
if method == sym::load { | ||
diag.build("atomic loads cannot have `Release` or `AcqRel` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Acquire`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`") | ||
.emit() | ||
} else { | ||
debug_assert_eq!(method, sym::store); | ||
diag.build("atomic stores cannot have `Acquire` or `AcqRel` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Release`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`") | ||
.emit(); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn check_memory_fence(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) { | ||
if_chain! { | ||
if let ExprKind::Call(ref func, ref args) = expr.kind; | ||
if let ExprKind::Path(ref func_qpath) = func.kind; | ||
if let Some(def_id) = cx.qpath_res(func_qpath, func.hir_id).opt_def_id(); | ||
if matches!(cx.tcx.get_diagnostic_name(def_id), Some(sym::fence | sym::compiler_fence)); | ||
if let ExprKind::Path(ref ordering_qpath) = &args[0].kind; | ||
if let Some(ordering_def_id) = cx.qpath_res(ordering_qpath, args[0].hir_id).opt_def_id(); | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, ordering_def_id, &[sym::Relaxed]); | ||
then { | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, args[0].span, |diag| { | ||
diag.build("memory fences cannot have `Relaxed` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Acquire`, `Release`, `AcqRel` or `SeqCst`") | ||
.emit(); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
if let ExprKind::Call(ref func, ref args) = expr.kind | ||
&& let ExprKind::Path(ref func_qpath) = func.kind | ||
&& let Some(def_id) = cx.qpath_res(func_qpath, func.hir_id).opt_def_id() | ||
&& matches!(cx.tcx.get_diagnostic_name(def_id), Some(sym::fence | sym::compiler_fence)) | ||
&& let ExprKind::Path(ref ordering_qpath) = &args[0].kind | ||
&& let Some(ordering_def_id) = cx.qpath_res(ordering_qpath, args[0].hir_id).opt_def_id() | ||
&& Self::matches_ordering(cx, ordering_def_id, &[sym::Relaxed]) | ||
{ | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, args[0].span, |diag| { | ||
diag.build("memory fences cannot have `Relaxed` ordering") | ||
.help("consider using ordering modes `Acquire`, `Release`, `AcqRel` or `SeqCst`") | ||
.emit(); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn check_atomic_compare_exchange(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) { | ||
if_chain! { | ||
if let Some((method, args)) = Self::inherent_atomic_method_call(cx, expr, &[sym::fetch_update, sym::compare_exchange, sym::compare_exchange_weak]); | ||
if let Some((success_order_arg, failure_order_arg)) = match method { | ||
if let Some((method, args)) = Self::inherent_atomic_method_call(cx, expr, &[sym::fetch_update, sym::compare_exchange, sym::compare_exchange_weak]) | ||
&& let Some((success_order_arg, failure_order_arg)) = match method { | ||
sym::fetch_update => Some((&args[1], &args[2])), | ||
sym::compare_exchange | sym::compare_exchange_weak => Some((&args[3], &args[4])), | ||
_ => None, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
if let Some(fail_ordering_def_id) = Self::opt_ordering_defid(cx, failure_order_arg); | ||
then { | ||
// Helper type holding on to some checking and error reporting data. Has | ||
// - (success ordering, | ||
// - list of failure orderings forbidden by the success order, | ||
// - suggestion message) | ||
type OrdLintInfo = (Symbol, &'static [Symbol], &'static str); | ||
const RELAXED: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Relaxed, &[sym::SeqCst, sym::Acquire], "ordering mode `Relaxed`"); | ||
const ACQUIRE: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Acquire, &[sym::SeqCst], "ordering modes `Acquire` or `Relaxed`"); | ||
const SEQ_CST: OrdLintInfo = (sym::SeqCst, &[], "ordering modes `Acquire`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`"); | ||
const RELEASE: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Release, RELAXED.1, RELAXED.2); | ||
const ACQREL: OrdLintInfo = (sym::AcqRel, ACQUIRE.1, ACQUIRE.2); | ||
const SEARCH: [OrdLintInfo; 5] = [RELAXED, ACQUIRE, SEQ_CST, RELEASE, ACQREL]; | ||
|
||
let success_lint_info = Self::opt_ordering_defid(cx, success_order_arg) | ||
.and_then(|success_ord_def_id| -> Option<OrdLintInfo> { | ||
SEARCH | ||
.iter() | ||
.copied() | ||
.find(|(ordering, ..)| { | ||
Self::matches_ordering(cx, success_ord_def_id, &[*ordering]) | ||
}) | ||
}); | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, fail_ordering_def_id, &[sym::Release, sym::AcqRel]) { | ||
// If we don't know the success order is, use what we'd suggest | ||
// if it were maximally permissive. | ||
let suggested = success_lint_info.unwrap_or(SEQ_CST).2; | ||
} | ||
&& let Some(fail_ordering_def_id) = Self::opt_ordering_defid(cx, failure_order_arg) | ||
{ | ||
// Helper type holding on to some checking and error reporting data. Has | ||
// - (success ordering, | ||
// - list of failure orderings forbidden by the success order, | ||
// - suggestion message) | ||
type OrdLintInfo = (Symbol, &'static [Symbol], &'static str); | ||
const RELAXED: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Relaxed, &[sym::SeqCst, sym::Acquire], "ordering mode `Relaxed`"); | ||
const ACQUIRE: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Acquire, &[sym::SeqCst], "ordering modes `Acquire` or `Relaxed`"); | ||
const SEQ_CST: OrdLintInfo = (sym::SeqCst, &[], "ordering modes `Acquire`, `SeqCst` or `Relaxed`"); | ||
const RELEASE: OrdLintInfo = (sym::Release, RELAXED.1, RELAXED.2); | ||
const ACQREL: OrdLintInfo = (sym::AcqRel, ACQUIRE.1, ACQUIRE.2); | ||
const SEARCH: [OrdLintInfo; 5] = [RELAXED, ACQUIRE, SEQ_CST, RELEASE, ACQREL]; | ||
|
||
let success_lint_info = Self::opt_ordering_defid(cx, success_order_arg) | ||
.and_then(|success_ord_def_id| -> Option<OrdLintInfo> { | ||
SEARCH | ||
.iter() | ||
.copied() | ||
.find(|(ordering, ..)| { | ||
Self::matches_ordering(cx, success_ord_def_id, &[*ordering]) | ||
}) | ||
}); | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, fail_ordering_def_id, &[sym::Release, sym::AcqRel]) { | ||
// If we don't know the success order is, use what we'd suggest | ||
// if it were maximally permissive. | ||
let suggested = success_lint_info.unwrap_or(SEQ_CST).2; | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, failure_order_arg.span, |diag| { | ||
let msg = format!( | ||
"{}'s failure ordering may not be `Release` or `AcqRel`", | ||
method, | ||
); | ||
diag.build(&msg) | ||
.help(&format!("consider using {} instead", suggested)) | ||
.emit(); | ||
}); | ||
} else if let Some((success_ord, bad_ords_given_success, suggested)) = success_lint_info { | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, fail_ordering_def_id, bad_ords_given_success) { | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, failure_order_arg.span, |diag| { | ||
let msg = format!( | ||
"{}'s failure ordering may not be `Release` or `AcqRel`", | ||
"{}'s failure ordering may not be stronger than the success ordering of `{}`", | ||
method, | ||
success_ord, | ||
); | ||
diag.build(&msg) | ||
.help(&format!("consider using {} instead", suggested)) | ||
.emit(); | ||
}); | ||
} else if let Some((success_ord, bad_ords_given_success, suggested)) = success_lint_info { | ||
if Self::matches_ordering(cx, fail_ordering_def_id, bad_ords_given_success) { | ||
cx.struct_span_lint(INVALID_ATOMIC_ORDERING, failure_order_arg.span, |diag| { | ||
let msg = format!( | ||
"{}'s failure ordering may not be stronger than the success ordering of `{}`", | ||
method, | ||
success_ord, | ||
); | ||
diag.build(&msg) | ||
.help(&format!("consider using {} instead", suggested)) | ||
.emit(); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-ordered in alphabetical order