Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ rust-analyzer #92583

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Jan 5, 2022

r? @ghost

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Jan 5, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2022

📌 Commit 2687a93 has been approved by lnicola

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 5, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92092 (Drop guards in slice sorting derive src pointers from &mut T, which is invalidated by interior mutation in comparison)
 - rust-lang#92388 (Fix a minor mistake in `String::try_reserve_exact` examples)
 - rust-lang#92442 (Add negative `impl` for `Ord`, `PartialOrd` on `LocalDefId`)
 - rust-lang#92483 (Stabilize `result_cloned` and `result_copied`)
 - rust-lang#92574 (Add RISC-V detection macro and more architecture instructions)
 - rust-lang#92575 (ast: Always keep a `NodeId` in `ast::Crate`)
 - rust-lang#92583 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 439a125 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Jan 5, 2022
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rust-analyzer-2022-01-05 branch January 5, 2022 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants