Revert #86853

[usbalbin]

Should fix issue found in #89432

[rust-highfive]

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[eddyb]

For the record, while I'm not going to open my own PR, I was able to get a simpler revert by reverting the merge commit instead of every single commit (eddyb@5345239), using:

git revert -m 1 c6007fdc7059c677a6c089e8d2915b264c0d1326

[usbalbin]

Oh, thanks :)

[oli-obk]

@bors r+ p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit 81bb5a5 has been approved by oli-obk

[usbalbin]

Should I add some sort of regression test like the one mentioned here? If so where should I put it?

[oli-obk]

Yea, that seems useful, but it could also wait for the real fix PR. I'm not sure where we have the tests for const trait bounds, but probably in src/test/consts

[oli-obk]

r? @oli-obk

@bors delegate+

Feel free to r=oli-obk in case you add a test

[bors]

✌️ @usbalbin can now approve this pull request

[usbalbin]

Yea, that seems useful, but it could also wait for the real fix PR. [...]

If the highest prio is getting the revert landed, then I'll wait for another PR/the fix PR. :)

[usbalbin]

@bors r=oli-obk

[bors]

📌 Commit 6a0c97a has been approved by oli-obk

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6a0c97a with merge b9712854cd6786939d92688a4bbb301d4756fa3e...

[bors]

💥 Test timed out

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[workingjubilee]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6a0c97a with merge a8387ae...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing a8387ae to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a8387ae): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression