-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add documentation for Ipv6MulticastScope
#86936
Conversation
r? @m-ou-se (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The documentation itself looks good and the reason of #[non_exhaustive]
makes sense to me.
@m-ou-se This has an unstable breaking change, does it need a review from t-libs-api or could I r+ it? |
Changing unstable things is usually fine. If it's a popular API or the change is somewhat controversial, it'd be good to get the team involved. @bors r=JohnTitor |
📌 Commit a674ae6 has been approved by |
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#86183 (Change environment variable getters to error recoverably) - rust-lang#86439 (Remove `Ipv4Addr::is_ietf_protocol_assignment`) - rust-lang#86509 (Move `os_str_bytes` to `sys::unix`) - rust-lang#86593 (Partially stabilize `const_slice_first_last`) - rust-lang#86936 (Add documentation for `Ipv6MulticastScope`) - rust-lang#87282 (Ensure `./x.py dist` adheres to `build.tools`) - rust-lang#87468 (Update rustfmt) - rust-lang#87504 (Update mdbook.) - rust-lang#87608 (Remove unused field `Session.system_library_path`) - rust-lang#87629 (Consistent spelling of "adapter" in the standard library) - rust-lang#87633 (Update compiler_builtins to fix i128 shift/mul on thumbv6m) - rust-lang#87644 (Recommend `swap_remove` in `Vec::remove` docs) - rust-lang#87653 (mark a UB doctest as no_run) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Adds basic documentation to the unstable
Ipv6MulticastScope
, as well as marking it#[non_exhaustive]
because future IETF RFCs may introduce additional scopes. The documentation mentions this in a section "Stability Guarantees":