-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Point out implicit deref coercions in borrow #81629
Conversation
r? @lcnr (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @Aaron1011 |
For some reason, in It looks like auto-dereferencing occurs when lowering HIR to THIR https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/overview.html?highlight=Deref#intermediate-representations. There should be some information about when the dereferencing was implicitly inserted or not somewhere, but I'm not sure where to find it. |
loan.reserve_location.block, | ||
), | ||
) { | ||
let is_deref = !from_hir_call && tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::deref_method, method_did); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just out of interest: can you explain why we only want to output this error note if from_hir_call
is false?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to add the note in the output for something like issue-81365.rs
where the deref is implicit, v. something like issue-81365-8.rs
, where the deref is explicit and shouldn't be added. In fact, it is what I'm working on now, trying to figure out if the deref was explicit or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it seems like from_hir_call
is true for a syntactic call like f(...)
or x.f()
but false for an operator, perhaps overloaded, like *x
or the implicitly inserted deref in something like (&x).0
.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
081dfe6
to
8b2b07b
Compare
Clean up code
8b2b07b
to
8412da6
Compare
Sorry for the delay in getting this! Overall, this looks good. I think there may be some other borrow-related errors where we might want to emit this diagnostic. However, that can be done in follow-up PRs as needed. Could you add a 'deref defined here' note, similar to
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Update conflict_errors.rs Add deref definition location
e5b1e1c
to
99f4573
Compare
@Aaron1011 any idea why the check took so long? i ran the ui tests on my machine and it took about 12 minutes to run them all. |
I'm not sure - I suspect it was an issue on GitHub's end. cc @estebank: Does this PR look good to you? |
use std::ops::Deref; | ||
|
||
struct DerefTarget { | ||
target_field: bool, | ||
} | ||
struct Container { | ||
target: DerefTarget, | ||
container_field: bool, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Deref for Container { | ||
type Target = DerefTarget; | ||
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target { | ||
&self.target | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Container { | ||
fn bad_borrow(&mut self) { | ||
let first = &self.target_field; | ||
self.container_field = true; //~ ERROR E0506 | ||
first; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any reason the different tests couldn't be merged into fewer files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I don't understand the previous phases that transformed the code into MIR, so I made some tests with the intent of something like "what happens to double implicit derefs?", "what happens to indexing and function calls?", "what happens with implicitly inserted v. explicitly inserted derefs?". The only reasons I haven't merged them is because I don't know enough to decide what distinctions in the tests are important, and also that I'm not sure if any existing tests cover what I've already written. If you think that some tests are redundant, I will remove them.
let tcx = self.infcx.tcx; | ||
// point out implicit deref coercion | ||
if let ( | ||
Some(Terminator { kind: TerminatorKind::Call { from_hir_call: false, .. }, .. }), | ||
Some((method_did, method_substs)), | ||
) = ( | ||
&self.body[loan.reserve_location.block].terminator, | ||
crate::util::find_self_call( | ||
tcx, | ||
self.body, | ||
loan.assigned_place.local, | ||
loan.reserve_location.block, | ||
), | ||
) { | ||
if tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::deref_method, method_did) { | ||
let deref_target = | ||
tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::deref_target).and_then(|deref_target| { | ||
Instance::resolve(tcx, self.param_env, deref_target, method_substs) | ||
.transpose() | ||
}); | ||
if let Some(Ok(instance)) = deref_target { | ||
let deref_target_ty = instance.ty(tcx, self.param_env); | ||
err.note(&format!( | ||
"borrow occurs due to deref coercion to `{}`", | ||
deref_target_ty | ||
)); | ||
err.span_note(tcx.def_span(instance.def_id()), "deref defined here"); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we move this code to a method with an appropriate name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've moved the code in my latest commit.
@1000teslas Thanks for all of your work! @bors r+ |
📌 Commit 1847a6c has been approved by |
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#81629 (Point out implicit deref coercions in borrow) - rust-lang#82113 (Improve non_fmt_panic lint.) - rust-lang#82258 (Implement -Z hir-stats for nested foreign items) - rust-lang#82296 (Support `pub` on `macro_rules`) - rust-lang#82297 (Consider auto derefs before warning about write only fields) - rust-lang#82305 (Remove many RefCells from DocContext) - rust-lang#82308 (Lower condition of `if` expression before it's "then" block) - rust-lang#82311 (Jsondocck improvements) - rust-lang#82362 (Fix mir-cfg dumps) - rust-lang#82391 (disable atomic_max/min tests in Miri) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fixes #81365
@Aaron1011 I'm not sure why my code shows the note even in an implicit
Deref
call. See the output forissue-81365-8.rs
.